Submission to the NDIS Senate Inquiry 2026 <submitted 10 July, amended 7 August>
I am making this submission as an Australian citizen of Chinese migrant background, and as a medical degree holder and a woman, who has survived a near-fatal injury for two decades with scant support.
For safety reasons, I ask that my identity be kept confidential to protect me from retaliation and from further exposure to my perpetrators.
With the submission deadline approaching and my cognitive impairment limiting my ability to revise the submission in time, I ask that my submission be published in its entirety, as my story is not only personal, but also of significant public interest.
———
My injury was the result of a fraudulent chiropractic practice (which was referred by a GP). Because of the severity of the injury, I was forced to give up a successful career, sell my home, and live on Disability Support Pension (until 2018).
To seek life-saving treatment, I travelled overseas and stayed in hotels for eleven years.
After my injury, I conducted extensive research—not only to save my own life, but also to seek justice. With my dual professional backgrounds in medicine and IT engineering, I found that: (1) the medical device that the chiropractor used to injure me is neither safe nor harmless, despite what authorities and the public are led to believe; (2) the entire chiropractic industry is fraudulent and potentially deadly. Innocent and unsuspecting people—like I once was—die or suffer serious injuries following routine chiropractic visits, while the under-reporting rate is nearly 100%.
My research also revealed profound limitations within modern medicine, as well as widespread ignorance within the medial profession. However, ever since I attempted to speak out and blow the whistle, I have become a target of relentless persecution and humiliation.
I realise that doctors do not actually possess the education and training necessary to fully understand my findings. But this is no excuse for them to fabricate reports and frame patients.
I raise this issue to draw attention to the elephant in the room: widespread ignorance among doctors—born of limitations of modern medicine—could have devastating impact for the patients.
When that ignorance is exploited by fraudsters, such as the chiropractor—who is protected by powerful institutions and aided by unscrupulous lawyers—the results can be deadly for the victim.
When that ignorance is exploited by politicians serving vested interests, the outcome can be deaths on a grand scale—all in the name of protecting tax payer money.
Modern medicine has hard limit. This is evidenced by the rising prevalence of chronic illnesses, such as Chronic Pain, ME/CFS, and Long Covid; or neurodivergent and mental health conditions, such as autism, ADHD, and depression. For many of these patients, effective treatment simply do not exist, and doctors do not possess the knowledge or skills to truly help these patients. Yet our system forces patients to undergo endless, futile, at times harmful treatment to “prove” that nothing works before they can receive support. This bureaucratic rigidity creates a trap.
This trap disproportionately catches the isolated and vulnerable, such as migrants from CALD background like myself. I know this firsthand. Despite having worked hard and built a successful career before my injury, I was subjected to a malicious campaign involving hundreds of fabricated records designed to frame me—in particular, framing my life-threatening injuries as mental health problems, derisively asserting that my symptoms were “culturally normative for Chinese”; while insinuating welfare fraud, ID fraud, Chinese spy, and even attempting to turn my near-fatal injury claim into personal affairs. My isolation and poor health left me defenceless against this persecution.
of1 4
Evidence of life-threatening injuries—as a result of chiropractic malpractice—were buried by doctors, lawyers, courts, and the government alike. If these mafias are capable of doing this to me without consequences, what hold them back from doing it to others?
All along, the white male fraudster—who was secretly using me for his research on the medical device, and left me disabled—gets all the support, sympathy, and protection.
Ever since the large volumes of false evidence were manufactured to frame me in the Australian court—and my personal injury lawyers used the false evidence to coerce, bully, and extort me—I began to observe a troubling trend in the broader social security realm: ignorance among doctors is being weaponised—catastrophically and shamelessly—against patients across the Disability Support Pension, Job Seeker, Aged Care, Veterans Affairs, and the Medico-Legal systems.
Demanding that patients exhaust non-existent treatments before granting NDIS support, as the government plans to do, will only deepen this injustice.
Patients effectively become lab rats, and run the risks of being harmed, scammed, and even framed by unethical medical professionals in the process, (as happened to me).
Together with the new sweeping power to be granted to the minister—while oversight and accountability are virtually non-existent—chronically ill patients in isolated situations may simply disappear from the healthcare system (as is my case).
As far as I am concerned, this is no difference to attempted murder.
It may be worth noting: after hundreds of fabricated records were produced in court to frame me from 2013 onwards, anti-China rhetoric emerged in Australia and has since spread throughout the Western world. Years later, in 2018, the world-first anti-encryption law was passed by our parliament, allowing authorities to spy on Australians without a warrant or independent oversight.
In my experience of being hounded by “authorities” for decades—while severely disabled and isolated—I can say with absolute certainty: there are malicious actors operating behind the scenes, around the clock, to stalk, harass, and frame me, with the aim of eliminating me.
Mounting evidence suggests that government intelligence resources have been misused in this illicit and deadly operation.
They prey on my trust in authorities, gather my intelligence solely to construct cases against me, harass and further isolate me, and exert coercive control. For over a decade, I have been subjected to invasive surveillance inside my accommodation and persistently followed whenever I leave. At one point, the stalking and harassment had a distinct sexual intent.
Given the life-threatening conditions and severe disabilities I continue to live with—and the systematically fabricated evidence used to frame me—this is attempted murder.
Indeed, my well-resourced, well-connected stalkers have been linked to:
- Several suspicious deaths across multiple countries, including Australia.
- Imprisonment of a practitioner who treated my injury and saved my life.
- Illegal seizure of my passport by a foreign government.
- Fraudulent court proceedings, illegal detention, and human trafficking. The list goes on.
My past efforts to report or seek investigation through official channels, including the Police, were systematically sabotaged and even turned into intelligence gathering opportunities for my stalkers, leading to escalated harassment and further deaths.
Notably, the first three suspicious deaths linked to my stalkers occurred between January and August 2018—a period that coincides with the existence of the Ministry for Law Enforcement and
of2 4
Cyber Security (from December 2017 to August 2018). This ministry was created ostensibly to combat organised crime.
For my safety, I have not re-applied for any government support after Centrelink cancelled my Disability Support Pension and issued me a fake debt that year (2018). This came shortly after my injury claim against the chiropractor was dismissed in court earlier that same year (2018).
I was framed into the Centrelink debt by my stalkers.
To make things appear “not personal”, my stalkers have a habit of getting other innocent people involved and victimised. — Robodebt, NDIS overhaul, and several other disasters, fit this pattern.
A largely overlooked fact is that many welfare recipients are not passive dependents. They include whistleblowers, victims of medical malpractice, individuals defrauded by those shielded by powerful institutions. These people represent inconvenient truths for those in power.
When governments prioritise corporate and lobbying interests over public interest, welfare systems have become tools of suppression rather than support.
In effect, the livelihoods of vulnerable victims are at the mercy of a government beholden to their perpetrators.
When the stakes are high and accountability is elusive, unjustly penalising large numbers of welfare recipients, while shifting blame onto automated systems—as Robodebt did—creates the illusion that it is “nothing personal”. But behind the facade lies a strategy to suppress dissent, all under the guise of protecting taxpayer money. Should legal consequences arise, defending public servants will be funded by taxpayers anyway, without putting a dent in their personal wallet.
This troubling pattern has obviously extended to the NDIS, where the participants are subjected to similar punitive measures under a system that is more focused on control than care!
If this kind of coercive control happens in a domestic violence situation, it is increasingly recognised as a criminal offence in many jurisdictions, precisely because it is often a precursor to murder. So why is it okay when it is done by a government in service of vested interests?
Furthermore, what has not been talked about is, automated systems can actually be manipulated through human intervention, often temporarily and difficult to trace. Yet this aspect has been persistently overlooked by authorities—likely intentionally.
When systems are manipulated by malicious actors operating behind the scenes to target vulnerable people—and scrutiny is absent—deaths and suicides become an expected outcome.
Drawing on my experience as a former IT professional, I uncovered evidence of a cyberattack on government networks, targeting my account. This attack forms part of a broader, multi-network cybercrime and is linked to my stalkers. It poses significant risks to cybersecurity and undermines institutional integrity. It has also been linked to Services Australia and the Office of Inspector General of Intelligence and Security, among others.
However, the affected government agency dishonestly denied that any attack ever occurred. The IT experts involved in the investigation, if genuine, were either grossly incompetent or complicit. I suspect the latter.
As of today, the reported cyberattack—despite government denial—remains active.
At the same time, the cybercrime reporting process through the Police and the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) - Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) turned out to be a sham, leaving me with no safe pathways to have my report investigated.
of3 4
This cybersecurity issue is relevant to the NDIS inquiry, because there is no doubt that the NDIS systems are similarly compromised; any complaint or investigation would likely go nowhere. (How the Robodebt investigation panned out speaks for itself. I am afraid that the NDIS inquiry will be sabotaged in ways I cannot imagine.)
Integrity is a big issue in both public and private sectors, and IT staff are not immune to its failure.
In any event, intelligence agencies like ASIO are not above the need for scrutiny.
More recently, my complaint to the Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee (PCCC) in Queensland was dismissed with a gag order and forged documents. In other words, parliamentary proceedings are hijacked by my stalkers, too!
Without investigating the cybercrime (illicit surveillance) as a priority, everyone will continue to be played into the hands of mafias, who clearly have control over everything in this digital world.
To me, a deadly trend is unmistakable: vulnerable people have been under the coercive control of our government for over a decade—driving people to suicide when they are left with no way to live.
This dire situation is compounded by the aforementioned limitations of modern medicine, and the IT failures that authorities strenuously denied.
With my dual professional backgrounds in medicine and IT engineering—and as someone who has been disabled and targeted by powerful fraudsters for decades—I find myself asking:
-
Has the government been exploiting the limitations of modern medicine and weaponising them against disabled people—while also facilitating IT failures and concealing fraudulent misconduct—to serve vested interests under the guise of protecting taxpayer money (or national security)?
-
Is the Australian government actually controlled by mafias? Based on my personal experience, the answers are definitely Yes to both.
Given the many deaths and suicides already linked to Robodebt, Targeted Compliance Framework, Aged Care, Veterans Affairs, and now the NDIS—arising from the government’s wilful negligence—the long-overdue questions are:
-
Does the government’s action/inaction amount to criminal negligence or even attempted murder?
-
Will anyone be held accountable if more deaths/suicides occur as a consequence of the NDIS overhaul?
Interestingly, while the government goes to great lengths to restrict access for disabled people, it remains surprisingly lenient toward fraudster providers who have plundered the NDIS for a decade.
With the above in mind, a deeper question arises:
- What is the true motive behind the NDIS scheme? of4 4