NDIA Accountability Project

Applied behaviour analysis and positive behaviour support

‹ PrevPage 1 of 9 · Source p. 1Next ›
Comments

DOCUMENT 1

Applied behaviour analysis and positive behaviour support

The content of this document is redacted.

 Please note:

 The research and literature reviews collated by our TAB Research Team are not to be

  shared external to the Branch. These are for internal TAB use only and are intended to

   assist our advisors with their reasonable and necessary decision-making.

  Delegates have access to a wide variety of comprehensive guidance material. If

  Delegates require further information on access or planning matters, they are to call the

TAPS line for advice.

 The Research Team are unable to ensure that the information listed below provides an

  accurate & up-to-date snapshot of these matters

Research question: What is the difference between Applied Behaviour Analysis and positive behaviour support? Is intensive ABA effective for managing behaviours of concern? What qualifications and legislative requirements are required for a practitioner to develop or implement a positive behaviour support programme?

Date: 21/07/2022 Requestor: Kim redacted Endorsed by (EL1 or above): Naomi redacted Researcher: Aaron redacted Cleared by: Shane redacted

Contents

V1.0 25-07-2022 ABA and PBS Page 1 of 9 OFFICIAL 1 of 50

Summary

There is ambiguity in the way Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) and Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) are used to describe interventions or disciplines. ABA as a label can be used in wider or more narrow ways and depending on how the term is used it might encompass PBS as well. In the sense employed in much NDIS documentation, PBS is theoretically informed by ABA as an applied research program, while being distinguished from ABA as a specific intervention or therapy programme.

There is moderate level evidence that intensive ABA programs reduce behaviours of concern. However, no information on dosage was found.

While there are some intensive ABA programmes that can only be run by Board CertifiedBehaviour Analysts, some ABA-informed programs can be run by qualified health professionals (e.g Occupational Therapists, Speech Therapists) for which the programme is within their scope of practice. Positive behaviour support practitioners require specific registration through the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission in order to provide behavioural assessments and behaviour support plans for NDIS participants. However, I cannot find any evidence that “behaviour support practitioner” or “positive behaviour support practitioner” are regulated terms outside of their use in the context of NDIS registered providers.

Positive Behaviour Support

The NDIS Quality and Safeguard Commission Positive Behaviour Support Capability Framework defines PBS as:

  the integration of the contemporary ideology of disability service provision with the clinical framework of applied behaviour analysis. Positive behaviour supports are supported by evidence encompassing strategies and methods that aim to increase the person's quality of life and reduce challenging behaviour (NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, 2019, p.5).

The idea that PBS is ABA plus “the contemporary ideology of disability” refers to Carr et al.’s suggestion that PBS emerged from three sources including ABA, the normalisation/inclusion movement and person-centred values (Carr et al, 2002). There is some question about whether PBS is a kind of ABA, or just informed or otherwise related to it (Whitehouse et al, 2020). It is also not clear what the practical implications of this question are.

Like ABA, PBS focusses on socially significant behaviours though its target behaviours are restricted to challenging or problematic behaviours. There is no agreed terminology used to describe challenging or problematic behaviours. Synonyms used include: behaviours of concern, challenging behaviour, behaviour that challenges, maladaptive behaviour, interfering behaviour, disruptive behaviour, problem behaviour and problematic behaviour (Whitehouse et al, 2020; Rogers et al, 2020).

Intensive Applied Behaviour Analysis and behaviours

of concern

Whitehouse et al. (2020) summarise evidence from systematic reviews which track the effect of behavioural techniques on challenging behaviours. In three systematic reviews including a variety of behavioural interventions, they note a moderate level of evidence indicating a positive effect on challenging behaviours. Regarding specific interventions, they note that there is low level evidence that Functional Communication Training and Discrete Trial training have a positive effect on challenging behaviours and moderate level of evidence that Early intensive behavioural intervention has a null effect on challenging behaviours.

The UK’s National Autism Centre report (2015) notes that behavioural interventions can reduce problem behaviours for people aged 3 – 22 years old. More specifically, ABA type programs delivered 25-40 hours per week for 2-3 years are shown to reduce problem behaviours for children aged 0 – 9. More recently, a team from the US-based National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice found Functional Communication Training – an off-shoot of ABA – has a positive effect on reducing behaviours of concern for children 3 – 18 years. They also found Discrete Trial Training – another ABA off-shoot – can be effective at reducing behaviours of concern in children aged 6 – 11 years (Steinbrenner et al, 2020).

  • However, due to the layout of both the National Autism Centre report and the Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice report, it is not clear from which studies they derived the confident assessment that ABA-type therapies can reduce problem behaviours. This is important as other reviews make more tentative claims.

Rogers et al (2020) reviewed 20 intensive ABA studies and found one noting reduction in b ehaviours of concern but results were not statistically significant. In their systematic review, Reichow et al (2018) considered 2 studies which tracked problem behaviours. They found very low-quality evidence that EBEI did not have a statistically significant difference effect at reducing behaviours of concern compared to therapy as usual control. However, given the growth of autism research in the last 5 years, currency is a problem for this review (Whitehouse et al, 2020).

This brief summary does show some evidence for effectiveness of ABA-type therapies in reducing behaviours of concern. There are some inconsistencies in results and the research could be of higher quality. It is also worth noting that none of the reviews spoke to the dosage required to effect a reduction in behaviours of concern. While 25-40 hours per week is noted as the dosage in the National Autism Centre report, it is not clear from the evidence reviewed that this level of therapy is required to achieve the outcomes stated or that other therapies derived from ABA have this level of implementation.

Also of note, there is evidence that other types of therapies are also effective at reducing behaviours of concern. For example, of 28 evidence-based practices that Steinbrenner et al consider, only 2 did not show some effect at reducing behaviours of concern for some age group of children or young adults.

Reichow et al conclude their review by saying:

 Given the lack of high-quality, generalizable evidence to determine the effects of Early
  Intensive Behavioural Intervention (EIBI) for ASD, it is important that decisions about its
 use are made on a case-by-case basis. It is also important that providers of EIBI are
 aware of the limited quality of the current evidence and use clinical decision-making
   guidelines, such as seeking the family’s input and drawing upon prior clinical
  experience, when making recommendations to clients on the use of EIBI (Reichow et al,
  2018, p.17).

6. Practitioner qualifications and registration requirements

6.1 Board Certified Behaviour Analysts

ABA practitioners should be qualified, regulated and deliver services that are within the scope of their clinical practice. Unlike other allied health professionals in Australia, ABA practitioners are currently accredited internationally by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) based in USA (Whitehouse et al, 2020; Association forBehaviour Analysis Australia, n.d).

  • Registered Behavior Technician (RBT) – works under supervision of BCaBA and

  • Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analyst (BCaBA) – works under supervision of

  • Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) – works independently and can supervise

  • RBT and BCaBA (Behaviour Analysis Certification Board, n.d, Board Certified

Behavior Analyst).

To gain and maintain accreditation as a BACB, a practitioner needs to:

  • complete a recognised course or equivalent professional experience
  • pass an exam
  • meet continuing education requirements
  • adhere to ethics requirements
  • recertify every 2 years ( Behaviour Analysis Certification Board, n.d, Credentials ).

Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia has expressed their intention to take up regulation and accreditation of ABA practitioners in Australia:

As of December 2019 the BACB announced that it will limit certification to a select number of countries. Currently, Australia is one of the countries where BACB certification is still available but the longevity of this option is unknown. This has highlighted the need for Australia to have its own regulatory body for behaviour analysts. ABA Australia saw the need of our field and felt that it was inline with our mission and objectives to take on this challenge and continue our efforts to disseminate safe and ethical practice of ABA ( Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia, n.d, Professional Self-Regulation ).

Not all interventions which incorporate the principles or strategies of ABA are restricted to certified BCBAs. The figure below from Whitehouse et al (2020, p.47) describes different pathways by which ABA-type or associated interventions can be practiced.

6.2 Behaviour support and the NDIS

Specialist behaviour support is provided through a participant’s NDIS plan through the Improved Relationships budget using line items:

  -   Specialist Behavioural Intervention Support
  -  Behaviour Management Plan Including Training in Behaviour Management Strategies

A registered specialist behaviour support practitioner must develop all functional behaviour assessments and Behaviour Support Plans, as positive behaviour support practice requires a specific skillset and appropriate safeguards (Practice Guidance – Behaviour Support and Behaviours of Concern). An NDIS behaviour support practitioner must be deemed suitable by the NDIS Quality and Safeguarding Commission (NDIS Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support Rules 2018, s17). To be deemed suitable the practitioner must be qualified, experienced and must have considered their professional development alongside the Positive Behaviour Support Capability Framework (NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, 2022, Fact sheet: New behaviour support practitioners).

V1.0 25-07-2022 ABA and PBS Page 7 of 9 OFFICIAL 7 of 50

References

Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia. (n.d). https://auaba.com.au/

Behavior Analysis Certification Board. (n.d). https://www.bacb.com/bcba/

Carr EG, Dunlap G, Horner RH, et al. (2002). Positive Behavior Support: Evolution of an Applied Science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1):4-16. doi:10.1177/109830070200400102

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied Behaviour Analysis (Vol. 3rd Ed). United Kingdom: Pearson

National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 2. https://www.nationalautismcenter.org/national-standards-project/phase-2/

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2015). Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: Prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges. Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11

NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (2019). Positive behaviour support capability framework: For NDIS providers and behaviour support practitioners. Penrith, Australia: NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. Available: https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/pbscapabilityframework

NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. (2022). Fact sheet: New entry level behaviour support practitioners applying for suitability. https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-07/New%20entry%20level behaviour%20support%20practitioners%20suitability.pdf

Reichow, B., Hume, K., Barton, E. E., & Boyd, B. A. (2018). Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009260.pub3

Rodgers M, Marshall D, Simmonds M, Le Couteur A, Biswas M, Wright K, et al. (2020) Interventions based on early intensive applied behaviour analysis for autistic children: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess, 24(35).

Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. The University of

Res&arett-peper

North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.

Whitehouse, A., Varcin, K., Waddington, H., Sulek, R., Bent, C., Ashburner, J., Eapen, V., Goodall, E., Hudry, K., Roberts, J., Silove, N., Trembath, D. (2020). Interventions for

children on the autism spectrum: A synthesis of research evidence. Autism CRC, Brisbane.

8. Version control

Version Amended Brief Description of Change

by

1.0 Aaron |Research focussing on relationship between Draft 25/07/2022

P| ABA and PBS

V1.0 25-07-2022 ABA and PBS Page 9 of 9

Comments

Loading comments…

What kind of comment is this?
Add a comment