Occupational therapist concerned about funding cuts to capacity building and participation supports

‹ PrevPage 1 of 2 · Source p. 1Next ›

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 Submission 1173

Dear Committee Members,

My name is , and I am an occupational therapist and owner of a private practice supporting over 300 NDIS participants in the Port Macquarie region of NSW.

I acknowledge that the current costs of the NDIS are unsustainable and agree that reform is necessary to ensure the Scheme’s longevity. However, I am deeply concerned that the proposed funding cuts, particularly the 10% reduction to capacity building daily activity supports and the 50% reduction to social, civic and community participation supports, will have unintended and damaging consequences for participants.

Key concerns:

  1. Premature funding cuts without alternatives: While there is an intention to increase community-based programs, such initiatives do not yet exist in our region. Introducing these funding cuts before viable alternatives are available will force participants into group-based centre programs, which do not meet individual needs or preferences. For many of the participants I support, this would be detrimental to their wellbeing, resulting in social isolation and further withdrawal, impacting their mental health then leading to increased risk of hospitalisation.

  2. Loss of individualised supports: The proposed changes will limit participants’ ability to engage in activities that align with their identity and goals. Individualised supports are essential for building new skills, fostering independence, and supporting pathways to employment and economic participation.

  3. Impact on skill development and long-term costs: Occupational therapists play a vital role in building participants’ skills and capacity, which can reduce the need for ongoing support worker funding over time. Cutting capacity building supports undermines this preventative approach and may increase long-term costs.

  4. Fear and reduced opportunity: The threat of budget cuts creates fear and uncertainty, limiting opportunities for participants to take risks, try new things, and work towards greater independence. This is contrary to the NDIS’s purpose as an insurance scheme designed to invest in people’s futures.

What I am asking Parliament to do:

Reconsider the proposed reductions to capacity building and participation supports until genuine, accessible community-based alternatives are in place.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 Submission 1173