Cri du Chat syndrome participant's concerns over social and community participation funding cuts

‹ PrevPage 1 of 3 · Source p. 1Next ›

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 Submission 1314

​SENATE SUBMISSION​

​NDIS Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026​

​About our family​

​My name is — I am the cousin of​ ​, who is 32 and has Cri du​ ​Chat syndrome. lives at home with my Aunt and Uncle in Cammeray.​ ’s NDIS funding allows her to have access to support workers, physical therapy,​ ​speech therapy and social and community programs - all of which are essential to her being​ ​part of a community of people who are facing similar life challenges as she is, but also as an​ ​active and valued member of our wider society.​

​Why I am concerned about this Bill​

​I am writing to oppose provisions of the NDIS Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future​ ​Generations) Bill 2026 that would directly harm our family and many others like us.​

​1. The 50% cut to social and community participation funding — the day​ ​program is not optional​ ​For adults with Cri du Chat syndrome living at home, the day program is not a leisure​ ​activity. It is a structured, therapeutic environment staffed by trained workers who understand​ ​our family member’s communication needs, behavioural profile, personal care requirements,​ ​and medical needs. It is where develops skills, maintains social connections, and​ ​has a life of her own outside of the family home.​ ​The proposed 50% cut to social and community participation funding — which is how day​ ​program attendance are funded — would directly reduce the number of days can​ ​attend. She cannot attend at a lower level of staffing. Her care needs have not changed. The​ ​provider cannot absorb a 50% funding cut and remain financially viable.​ ​If day program attendance is cut, will be forced to stay at home, without the social​ ​interaction that she craves and needs.​

​2. Parental responsibility assumptions​ ​I have watched my Aunt and Uncle take on the challenges of having a career and caring for​ her entire life. The level of care they provide is substantial, skilled, and ongoing, and​ ​one that is often not witnessed outside the family home. The Bill proposes to embed an​ ​assumption that parents will continue to provide ‘substantial care’, without any consideration​ ​of age, health, capacity, or the sustainability of the carer’s role.​

​More recently my Uncle has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s, which has left more of a​ ​burden on my Aunt and ’s younger sister to provide care for both and her​ ​husband. I have witnessed my Aunt and ’s younger sister take on the responsibility​ ​of being carers for in ways that respond specifically to her needs, whilst trying to​ ​balance their own health, mental health and careers. All of which are a juggle for those of us​ ​without the additional challenges of someone with Cri du Chat syndrome or any special​ ​needs.​

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 Submission 1314

​The NDIS was supposed to ensure that families like mine have backup, not that we were the​ ​backup. As my Aunt and Uncle both age and face health challenges of their own, reducing​ ​funded support is not a saving. It is the creation of a future crisis.​

​3. The Minister’s power to make further cuts (proposed section 34A)​ ​The Bill gives the Minister power to cut any support category by any percentage, at any time,​ ​without individual assessment and without the right of review. The 50% social and​ ​community participation cut is the first use of this power — but nothing prevents further cuts​ ​to core supports, supported independent living, or assistive technology. There is no floor.​ ​There is no independent check. This is an unlimited power over the lives of people with​ ​disability, with no equivalent protection for those affected.​

​What I am asking​

​•​ ​Reject the 50% social and community participation cut, or at minimum exempt people​ ​in structured day programs who have no alternative provision.​ ​•​ ​Remove proposed section 34A in its current form, or require individual assessment​ ​before any determination affects a participant’s plan.​ ​•​ ​Require the parental responsibility provisions to include consideration of carer age,​ ​health, and sustainability.​ ​•​ ​Maintain the right to seek plan review when a family’s circumstances change,​ ​including when a carer’s health declines.​

​My family’s story​

is not just my cousin - I have always treated her as one of my sisters. I have​ ​watched her deal with the hardships of life (from the bullying at school to those that just don’t​ ​understand her as she has grown up) with a smile on her face and a level of positivity that no​ ​one can match.​

​The NDIS funding has allowed to access services that have enhanced her life and​ ​well being, and have assisted my family in providing her with a quality of life on par with​ ​those without special needs.​

​Her funding has allowed her to have access to support workers who help her grow and​ ​become more independent through life skills development like cooking, cleaning and​ ​shopping - things we take for granted as part of our everyday activities.​

​She also has access to physical and speech therapy, which has made a substantial and​ ​positive impact for her communication skills. These therapies have allowed her to have a​ ​voice in society and allow her to not be an “invisible” participant in our community.​

​I fear the biggest impact to ’s quality of life will be the 50% cut to social and​ ​community participation. She has for the last 5 years been an active participant in Stellar​ ​experiences, as well as Bus Stop Films. These two groups have been a huge part of her life,​ ​allowing her to be social, build friendships, have experiences that would seem out of reach​ ​and live a fulfilled life outside of the home unit.​

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 Submission 1314

​All of these services are not just essential for ’s development, well-being, happiness​ ​and day to day function, but allow my family (and those in similar circumstances) to have​ ​some respite and support in caring for those with special needs. It also gives all of us hope​ ​that , and those like her, will be able to live independent and fulfilled lives with or​ ​without us.​

​Yours sincerely,​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​Publication preference:​​Please keep my name private​