National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026
Submission 147 - Supplementary Submission
Hello Senitors.
I am writing for you to consider this NDIS changes. Please place this with name details withheld. One significant point is the changes they have put in for parental responsibility. This new wording will mean that NDIS will be able to deny EVERY child. Support does make a household more efficient because it means that the parent isn’t having to do some of the disability requirements. Eg. Lifting, changing, behaviour concerns management (the parent may not get hit, kicked, stabbed etc). So having it stated in the new legislation that support cannot make a household more efficient is completely unacceptable.Families even with the support given still do substantial care above and beyond ordinarily expected for a child/young person without a disability There are so many things that well exceed what people see.Cutting access to community services without considering any circumstances of participant For NDIS anything leaving house counted as community access eg walking dog medical appointments seeing family grocery shopping work volunteering religious services plenty other things Cutting these restricts both persons disabilities their families personally we can leave home young person adequate staff This means lose ability leave Because supports removed cant leave at home themselves Will lose connection our community extremely limited high needs person With disability Not just ourselves but also denied access宗教服务 Our workers trained specifically come from Australian owned run company All money goes directly provided straight Australian company pays employees Both pay tax spend local community Simple explanation why $1 brings into
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026
Submission 147 - Supplementary Submission
If my person with disabilities does not receive the support they require, they will need to be placed in a specialised residential care with intensive support costing over $2Million per year. Reducing support not even cost effective in multiple forms. You might think that because my person has higher needs than us should fine, But based on actual legislatio that currently your review this what states/allowfor. I hope you seriously consider reviewing legistation remember everyone is just one accid from requiring suppor our government.This legisla allows ministe to cut any suport upto %without considinng persona nee. Pleas also know we took guardianship higheeds children provid them permanen famili saving millions of dollars yea.With far bette and cheaper lonterm outcomes.But wthout correct disability supporth it no longer be saf opton fo anoyone do.