National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing

the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 Submission dated: May 23rd, Author: I am mother and primary caregiver for three children who have disabilities. Also an Unregistered NDIS Provider Allied Health Professional.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Submission 187

I will be her carer for life as she will not be supported to develop her independence, with long term NDIS support investment designed to reduce long-term support costs to NDIS.

ZR - Aged 20: NDIS Participant Since 2019 For Autism Level 2

•Z Rhas disability complexities including autism-derived anxiety,cognitive impairmentsand pathological demand avoidance. •Z RHAS a complex history with other concurrent disabilitiesincluding ADHD.with abirthhistoryof neonatal prematurity.intraventricular haemorrhages, meningitiscausing mild acquired brain injury.hydrocephalus,and developmental delay. •Zac left school in early Year II due tot grossly insufficient fundingin hisNDIS planat that time.He was In Autistic Burnout from Schoolfor approximately3 years. •Heis nowalsoaNIISQParticipant since DecemberIIIDue To amotor vehicle accidentwhen he sustainedasevere traumaticbrain injuryleft while crossing theroad and being hit by acar. •DueToZRbeingan I IS Qparticipant.ND isdenying allautism supports onhis ND ISP lan.despiteAutism notbeings compensabledisability. •N DIS has removed ALL ZRssupportsfromh sNDISP Lan exceptTransportfundingIn NovemberI ID – essentially.he h as been‘technically’removed From ndsIs without removing him officially. The NDIS Compensation Branchwasnot willing to engagewith or collaborate With NI ISSQto ensure zr experiences no gapsinhissupportswhichbelieve istheir mutual obligation.NISSQ did attemptt oengageandcollaborateWith nDis unsuccessfully.I do *nothave the personalor practicalorfina l resources topursuethere moval ofall fundingFrom hisndisp Plan at ART.The S100 wass rejected Inn April 26 AsZRHAD NO FUNDING IN HIS PLAN, I WAS unable t obtain additional evidence– AND NdS DID NOT PROVIDE A Statement Of Reasons For rejection.ZR’s application for Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) in October II was alsorejected In MarchIIIDIS had previously advised me thatNISSq Is responsiblefor Traumatic Brain Injury home modifications.howeverNdis Was responsibleForTraumaticBrain injury SDa Funding .Ni IS Q does Not provide SDA funding.DESPITE this,NDS Rejectedtheapplicationciting Ni is q shouldprovideforall aspectsofhis housing needs.i am abouttosubmit a s100 Review forsda rejection howeverI cannot supplyadditionalevidencewithoutNDISPundingin hsplan sothis willalso beRejected. •Iam currentlyunable toworkdue to mychildren’s supportneeds,andthesignificant challengesOf navigating multiple systems,nlissq and ndIs without NDIS Support Coordinationf or Z R. AR – aged( zr’s twin )- ND ISP Participant Since 2019 FOR Autism Level3and Hearing Impairment(bilateral Cochlear Implants).

•The combination of Deafness And autism i incredibly challenging.Heals hasautism derived anxietyAnd ist at extreme risk o social isolation.

AR also has concurrent ADHD, and a borderline Intellectual Impairment (IQ just above 70). He presented at school with significant learning difficulties.
AR left school at the end of Year 10, being unable to tolerate engaging with school, and without adequate NDIS supports and funding, he remained in severe Autistic Burnout for more than 3 years.
AR requires extensive NDIS supports, including therapies, support coordination and support workers (daily living and social and community participation), and employment supports (support workers, employment readiness capacity building). With these extensive supports, he may be able to work part-time in supported employment in the long-term. He risks losing these supports with the new legislation and will go backwards.
AR currently has a good NDIS Plan with sufficient funding to meet his needs. Prior to this plan, created in November 2024, he had the same NDIS Plan funding since 2019, which was grossly inadequate to meet his disability support needs.
With the new legislation, and NDIS Participant reassessments, and tightening of access and further restricted approved NDIS supports, AR’s trajectory once again looks grim – if his supports are significantly reduced, particularly Social and Community Participation and Capacity Building funding, which is highly likely, he will not become a productive citizen. The difference in AR’s progress towards independence is astounding since he has received his November 2024 NDIS Plan with good funding -his trajectory towards becoming a productive member of society is significantly greater because of the increased investment in his disability supports. Without this, do not doubt AR would have deteriorated after leaving school with few employment prospects in future, and reduced independence skills, with poor wellbeing and mental health.

Personal and Professional Impacts on My Children and on My Carer Role Due To The Proposed Legislation Changes:

All three of my children individually present with highly complex functional impairments and disability support requirements. Combined my three childrens’ support needs create significant unsustainable carer load It incumbent on NDIS based its ‘original intent’, provide supports for my children beyond what normal parent would provide their same age -NDIS currently doing sufficiently changing definition parental support it impossible obtain supports than typical parents. NSDS funded Respite/Short Term Accommodation tightened legislation as Support Worker hours reduce my burden burnout enabling earn through employment boosting Superannuation assisting family cost living crisis This even further away now proposed changes Carers Gateway only mainstream option emergencies inappropriate most situations suited to individualised support needs proven impossible staff citing having no funding left respite or respite.

My intensive and unpredictable carer responsibilities impact my employability,
which forced me to start my own business in NDIS, being the only sector that financially viable compared to Private Health Insurance, Medicare, DVA or Privately funded services – most people can no longer afford to pay a gap, and mandated DVA bulk billing below service costs. • NDIS, being market stewards, strongly encouraged people like me do NDIS work; having remained unchanged for years; now legislation reduces rate further below service costs removing small businesses from NDIs favoring large corporations causing mass unemployment & reducing choice control over children’s access trusted exceptional supports taking considerable time effort trial error finding larger organizations are impersonal with unreachable corporate managers decision makers don’t care about us our kids employees contractors frequently move jobs new allied graduates minimal support supervision inexperienced workers. If this passes again have lesser quality supports if children receive funding based on proposed legislation smaller sole traders because trust relationship easy access owner discuss issues legislation creates barrier ensuring quality accessible NDIS registration does not ensure quality safe best use of funds due role having little/no income superannuation scared future NDIS other Government Agencies help address needs Carers budgets rarely consider/address needs Carers provide ‘slave labor’ contribute massively GDP. Most budget items make carer lives worse This is different reduced NDIS access support funding adversely affected after participants mostly women Labor purports supportive but will drive back home out employment increased exposure abuse lost skills loss income/superannuation financial vulnerability chronic disease mental health presentations wider public funded services SICK OF IT!!! Unemployable often require urgent time off meet disability support needs my children can only few hours week already developed significant chronic health stress If husband loses job unable to severe cost-of-living crisis anytime high-risk work Electrician.

Income Protection insurance is depleting his Superannuation at an alarming rate due to this high risk, and if needed, will not replace his current income which we are highly reliant on.
I am unable to get Income Protection insurance due to my poorly treated chronic conditions, and inability to consistently work in my business for two consecutive years, with very poor income • I no longer can’t be working within NDIS Occupational Therapy Business as sole trader because it was flexible around carer responsibilities but now market changes driven Labor Government (NDIS Market Stewards), legislative changes mean retraining other sectors or giving up AHPRA registration recency practice requirements HARD degree skills development all prevented earning decent wage most other sectors remunerated extremely poorly found recent Fair Work Commission Allied Health Professionals underpaid women mostly • Not eligible any government benefits except Carers allowance $77/week per child does remotely lost income lost superannuation assist address chronic health condition meet needs disabled children/family • No supports services available when age remove carer burden what happens die they’re provided sufficient NDIS support life worst fear legislation after cannot be a carer death difficult come by impossible In the proposed NDIS Legislation Amendment 2026 totally oppose:

The use of Algorithms without human oversight assessments funding determinations proven dangerous RoboDebt My Aged Care illegal Robodeb writing before using algorithm doesn’t excuse imposing harm on participants informal supports shifting costs levels Government.
Significant increase Ministerial powers modify NDLS legislation accountability checks balances genuine co-design layers disability community parliamentary oversight proposed powers are ableist enable discrimination and breaches create significant disadvantage people disabilities particularly live remote regionally financially limited.
Use modified I-CAN CIQ-R similarly standardised evidence-based assessment for Support Needs Assessments.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2023

Submission 187

Modifications to standardized assessments no longer evidence-based. 4. The use of non-evidence-based Support Needs Assessments bys non-clinical NDIs Planners, to determine NDIS Plan Funding where tool biased towards physical disabilities. The original assessments require completion Allied Health Professionals; modified versions need qualified clinical oversight because it’s not now standardized or evidenced based Brief training planners dangerous to participants.

Capacity Building Supports (cut)

This pushes financial practical responsibility onto State Territory budgets reducing disabled people limited mainstream supports forcing them find money private high-gap services most cannot afford risks repeating harm identified in Royal Commission will render many Allied Health Professions mostly women abruptly unemployed causing mass business closures again mainly women Women forced leave workforce majority Support Workers carers Allied Health professionals breach their human rights equitably work income job security would otherwise improve standard living reduce risk abuse wellbeing chronic disease mental health issues already significantly disadvantaged due equity barriers imposed patriarchal society Government Labor frequently states support improving equity yet policies say opposite and women’s getting worse

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill

Submission: Submission-187

The bill aims at securing future generations’ benefits in employment opportunities specifically targeting women while preventing potential harms identified through a previous royal commission. These cuts predominantly affect female carers who will exit their workplace/income opportunities; return home leading into isolation exhaustion increasing vulnerability towards domestic violence financial coercion reducing earnings and Superannuation thereby enhancing inequity and reliance financially upon partners which may lead them toward homelessness.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Preferencing use of limited number ‘large corporate preferred providers’ effectively removing small businesses & sole traders; disrupts capacity building progress.
Adding powers enabling arbitrary decisions w/o risk consideration; enabling blatant disability discrimination via changes like removal Autistic/Developmental Delay children before law passes, enables early intervention removal under Section 25 with nearly year-long exclusion without individual assessments completed. e.g., government can remove funding (€50% Social €Community Participation Funding) on all NDIs Plans without assessing risks/support needs addressed.

The Government placing political policy ahead:

Government Policy should drive public services ensuring Ministers make legislative, rule or guidance changes following due process co-design consultation scrutiny Parliament Disabilty Discrimination Human Rights agencies ACCC and NACC. australia is not an autocratic country but feels heading there. This legislation doesn’t uphold democratic principles requiring focus on government services to vulnerable citizens rather than certain sectors industries other interested parties. it’s not right Govt decide best disabled citizens which removes their agency rights opportunities ableist patriarchal discriminatory infantilising patronizing restrictive autocratic averse.

Removal comprehensive safeguards participant human rights proposed legislation

gov has responsibility provide public services through excellent fiscal management ensure any proposed legislation does enforce

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

unnecessary limits or removal of citizen’s agency, rights, and opportunities. The Government should ensure citizens affected by new or amended legislation are deeply and genuinely included in co-design of the development of this legislation. The proposed legislation itself has removed access to fair processes, appeals; ability to appeal all decision making; easily obtain advocacy/representation to participate in Reviews of Decisions & ART but government full legal assistance spends millions on representation against unrepresented participants. And still - NDIS found made incorrect decisions most cases don’t settle beforehand. it is terrifying government plans reduce powers from July so further eroded participant rights. Mark Butler MP also stated at his Press Conference Federal Court creates ‘barriers’ NDIS reform cuts which means he anticipates likely illegal best way prevent these barriers is reducing their power force remove aspects legislation wouldn’t surprise me if coming next.

The Government being biased market stewards removing independence

from NDIS market decision-making:

Preferencing large corporations instilling preferred providers Plan Management Support Coordination Therapy services Thriving Kids pushing out small businesses sole traders. Ensuring cost containment rejecting independent pricing report didn’t meet agenda commissioning a new ’independent’ price report that met their agenda Refusing release original independent pricing report public despite compulsion via Federal Government processes Publicly denouncing “unregistered providers” committing rorts fraud when evidence shows registration prevents either thing Driving narrative into domain created distrust hatred NDIS Participants Unregistered NDIS Providers Allied Health Professionals Disability Advocacy organisations Document examples website verbally press conferences mainstream social media Allied Health Professions gouging doing wrong things Occupational Physiotherapy often used case studies did not reflect reality around comparative pricing between schemes Example There are no Allied Health professionals can

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment

Submission: Submission-187

viably provide Bulk Billed services under Medicare due to the rebate only being around $70 for 20 minutes (after which there is a gap). Occupational Therapy services cannot be provided for only 20 minutes due to the nature our work always misunderstood by government The cost travel to home visits usually required) And hours service far exceeds rebat With gap costs imposed on medicare users Also occupational therapists forced bulk bill dva white gold card holders financially viable at all why it difficult veterans find occupational therapy services.

Government’s assertion ‘NDIS Registration’ will increase participant safety There evidence support this opinion or marketing strategy used publicly garner support mandatory ndis registration great expense ndis providers viability business avoidable extra each year NDIS Registered Providers commit fraud have access Agency Managed Plan funding without human oversight Self plan managed safeguards exist participants managers reviewing invoices before paid.

Participation Employment Supports Daily Living Supports Therapy Supports,

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Group Program funding etc), limited or non-existent remote and regional supports to name a few.

How on earth did they assess the evidence base to make this assertion?

Section: Use of Redbridge Group before NDIS Review completed

The use of Redbridge Group to advise on public narratives supporting cost-cutting policy was done BEFORE the Bonyhady review concluded: The agenda from both Labor & Liberal Coalition has been consistently aimed at significant cuts since years ago, suggesting their strategy involves designing cutbacks first then finding justification later if needed; otherwise making up data or misrepresent it; misleading stakeholders through fake independent pricing reviews that render services financially unviable in favor of preferred providers when direct proof is lacking; pushing out marketing firms to create supportive stories while ignoring full facts; distracting with frequent system changes, discrediting key supporters among stakeholders who are not informed about true intentions behind these actions; frequent biased stakeholder consultations leading nowhere as feedback gets ignored after exhausting participants’ patience by short timeframes; collaborating only within reform-supportive groups bound under confidentiality agreements, falsely claiming community support without genuine consultation process; almost always culminating into submitting legislation amendment bills so cruelly violating rights and enabling government control over NDIS processes. This results in long submissions like ours for Government benefit rather than participant welfare.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

THIS was the ‘original intent of the scheme’.

Australia can easily afford it - NDIS is cashflow positive for the economy. There are many other areas that, with political will,savings in the budget could be made- instead of harming NDIS Participants with cuts to their direct services.HANDS OFF!

The Government is effectively removing ‘support for life’.

Under this proposed legislation,‘support for life’– a key tenet of the NDIS Scheme at inception—is seriously at risk.Current NDIS Participants were accepted onto the scheme as needed—forever.Now,this legislation proposes re-assessment based on changed access criteria,their support curtailed,and once exited ex-Participants have nowhere but still need what they determined when entering.NDISHAS NOT ACCOMMODATED WHETHER THESE UNKNOWN TREATMENTS ARE ACCESSIBLE APPROPRIATE OR AFFORDABLE.There IS NO DISCLOSURE HOW THE REQUIRED TREATMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED, AND THERE IS NO GUARANTEE CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM SPECIALISTS AND ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS WILL BE ADHERED TO OR ACCEPTED.## The Governments increasing push for Participants to exhaust undisclosed‘treatments before accessing the NDIS’.This legislation does not accommodate whether these unknown ’treatments’are accessible appropriate or affordable.THERE IS NO DISCLOSURE how required treatmentswillbe determined and no guarantee clinical recommendations from Specialistsand Allied Health Professionals will be adheredtooraccepted.The NDIS Review by Bruce Bonyhady wasnot perfect—but itwas MUCH better thanwhatisbeingproposed inthislegislation.TheNDISReview focusedon improving INTERNALNDSprocesses,reducing bureaucracyburden on participantsreducing carer burden informal supports ensuring he rights ofparticipants theirinformalsupports were upheld reducingthe frequencyof reassessments enabling security consistentsupports longerensuring quicker reviewsfor support changes ensuringleveluating disabilitiesaccommodated keeping Early Intervention investment kept longterm benefit.This legislation is almost opposite all those things—the focusisonndisparticipants directly experiencing increasedbureaucracy loss essential

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Submission 187

The Government’s lack of transparency without means to compel it.

The government frequently denies FOI applications or sends them heavily redacted, avoiding scrutiny, transparency, accountability, The Government yet releases original Independent Pricing Report hidden under ‘cabinet privilege’.

Believe misrepresentation about NDIS through misinformation manipulation data withholding full context weakening their assertions. Ministerial protections mean people with disabilities cannot seek justice due dodgy deals defamation certain types services causing harm stakeholders.

The Minister’s protection prevents seeking justice from big business defaming professionals or services harming stakeholder interests.

The Government lacks genuine co-design disability community:

Engaging large providers benefiting future contracts; Excluding opinions disabled Peak Bodies Advocacy organizations; Using Non-Disclosure Agreements reducing transparency increasing amounts refusals FOI applications.

The Government uses phrases such as over-diagnosis return scheme mild moderate developmental delay autism fraud grifters rorters scoundrels etc., which are largely unfounded non-evidence based misinformation inciting public suspicion hatred for individuals and Providers.

Fraud minimal – only convictions date expenditure on crackdown approaching $900 million more planned next budget recovered funding around $133 billion. This does not include potential recoveries missed because Participants may submit claims (which might be fraudulent) often closed without investigation. This is value money most frequent excuse Planners deny essential supports to participants. Additional details below.

Additional Details

I have provided more detail on some of these points below:

The use of Algorithms without human oversight for NDIS Assessments and

NDIS Plan Funding Determinations

Repeats RoboDebt and MyAgedCare harm and deaths.
Algorithms cannot follow a conversational flow that enables the identification of serious functional capacity limitations or severe risks - Based on initial feedback from Support Needs Assessment Trial Participants, questions are too limited, structured, rigid, and biased towards physical disabilities.- Support Needs Assessments are being completed by NDIS Planners with no clinical qualifications or disability experience, with insufficient and undisclosed entered into an Algorithm ‘black box’ that is built around generic ‘block funding’, rather than ensuring the safety of NDIS Participants through appropriate individually derived NDIS Plan funding. Algorithms do not consider contextual influences on functional capacity and support needs.

Environment – Internal (body) physical, intellectual, neurological,

pyschosocial, or sensory impairments, for example, are not theonly factors to affect a person’s functional capacity. Disability andfunctional capacity are directly impacted by the variousenvironments they participate in:- Physical environment- Social environment Cultural environmentPolitical environmentSystem structural barriersFamily environmentHome environmentSchool or work environmentSocial factors – capacity of informal supports, whether a person isor is not socially isolated, has friends, has a support network,caneave their home to particpate socialy,is estrangedfrom familyan only childis parent carer themselveshas multiple children ora partner witth disabilitesgender diversecommunication challengeshomeless cultural or religious beliefs etc etc.is extremely important information when determiningfunctionalitycapacity and engagement wuththe environmentstheyparticipatein at homewhendinthecommunity.Employment factors epemployers Job Access have very limitedscope provide adjustments workplaces where reasonableand practicableWhereas NDIS Particpants who require supporworkershighly specialised custom assistive technologyexamplecannot obtain these without NDIS funding.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Key life transitions - starting school, leaving school, starting tertiary study, volunteering, getting and keeping a job, getting married,

pregnancy, having children, ageing, menopause, losing parent carers, family estrangement, experiencing serious health conditions (cancer, autoimmune), adjusting to a new disability (e.g. amputation) etc are very important considerations when determining functional capacity and support needs for NDIS Plan Funding allocation purposes.

Algorithms cannot consider:

Concurrent Disabilities-

intersecting influences of concurrent disabilitieswiththeNDISaccepteddisability,multiple NDISA cceptedisabilitie s ,orchronicdiseases/mentalhealthconditions,newlyacquired disabili tiesorserioushe althconditio ns afterN DISAcceptance,n ew ly acquired compensable injuries wherethesuppor tneedsforthen D IS accepteddis abilitystillexist butmayoverlap with them comp ens ableinjury . Alldisablety types- feedback on Support Needs Assessments trial is that th equestionsonlyconsiderst he‘bestday’function,donot askquestionss relevantto ‘invisible disabilities’,andhaveaphysical disablebias.Individualised presentationsofeachdisability-theAlgorithmwill likelybebasedongenericassumptionsaboutdiagnosesthat may notapplyt o theindividualNDISP articipantbeing assessed.Diagnosisess willbeknowntotheadvisory as thisisl ikelyrequiredat NDI SAccesstodeterminepermanencyodisability, p ermanencycannotbedeterminedwithoutconsid erging diagnosis,which determines which evidence-based treatments need to be exhaustedbefore Accessiss granted.ThiscontradictsGovernment claims that di agnosiswon’tberequiredd when assessingfunctional capacity. Fluctuations in functionalcapacity-Algorithmscannotpredict whentheseverity,thefrequencyorduration oflikelyfl uctuation s indi sability,t oe n sureadequate NDISPlan funding fortha t individual.Assumptionsoffl ictu ations cannotbemadeaccurately perdiagno stic type.Fluc tuationsm ayimpactotherd isabilitiesor healthconditions.Accessibilitybarriers-different ND ISParticipantsrequiredifferent disabilityaccommodati ons top ar ticipateeffectivelyintheSupport NeedsAssessment ,ormay requirerepresentation,a ssistivetechnology,interpreters,Auslaninterpre ters,b raille,reduced cognitive load,simplifiedlanguageetc.ND ISParticipant’swith compromisedself-insightmayover orunders te atheirfunction withintellectualdisabilitymaynotunderstand thequestions,w ithAutism maymask their disabilitiesore unabletospeak,ornam y prefervideo,p honeori npersonassessments.Cultural differencesandsensitivities-see1.3 .1and

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

The significant increase in Ministerial powers to modify the NDIS legislation:

which amounts to extreme, autocratic over-reach by NDIS Ministers strongly influenced by policy rather than best interests.
Risks exertion control mechanisms, eroding rights participants have under law, not exempted from Parliamentary scrutiny nor analyzed thoroughly.
Does not enshrine ‘co-design’ into scheme as originally promised intent of program. It allows NDLS Minister to make arbitrary decisions without independent evidence, or careful risk assessments being undertaken about support needs risks participant’s treating parties. can create barriers fair access processes appeal human rights, take future changes resulting exit scheme lifelong Labor), reduce funding expel specific cohorts discriminatory).

Use non-evidence-based Support Needs Assessments by non-clinical planners determine Plan Funding biased physical disabilities.

Feedback received confirms it does not contain questions relevant invisible disabilities consider environmental family community employment factors interplay multiple disabilities impact health conditions disability functional capacity focuses on Participant good day which will further reduce plan funding introduces extremely serious risk when these other factors are considered with clinical lens. Planners conducting Assessment unqualified inexperienced inadequately trained or knowledgeable Disability assessment potentially ableist unsympathetic towards Participants.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Work in what is touted to be ‘toxic culture’ biased against people with disabilities

NDIS Planners ARE NOT A SUITABLE REPLACEMENT TO CONDUCT SUPPORT NEEDS ASSESSMENTS compared to qualified, ethical and independently Registered and monitored Allied Health Professionals:

3.12 - NDIS Planners do not have clinical expertise to accurately assess the impact of disability on Participant functional capacity. Brief ‘training’ of NDIS Planners by an internal Allied Health Professional does NOT replace 4 years of university and multiple years of disability experience.

Social and Community Participation was one of the most important tenets of the original intent of the scheme‘original intent of the scheme’to end institutionalisation, exclusion, social isolation, poor wellbeingand associated healthmentalhealthchronic disease risks toppeoplewithdisabilitiesandtheircarers. ThisisabreachoftheUNCRPDagreementsignedbyAustralia.The reduction offunding because it directly impacts carersmostly womenforcing them out work back home.

Removal of comprehensive safeguards of NDIS Participant Rights Human Rights from legislation

The Government signatory UNCRPDTenetslegislationdoesnotupholdprinciplesinthisclearly breaches rights participants informal supports possibly even Directors Owners under UNCRPD. TheGovernmentbeingbiasedmarket stewardsremoving independencefromNDIS market decision making: The initially strongly encouraged development large NDISPbase.Government made subsequent sudden intermitted nontransparent unpredictable changes Price Guide particular without adequate warning immediately implemented created atmosphere distrust fear exhaustion in Providers Participants. Capped rates for despite clear evidence other insurance schemes higher than NDIS E.g Occupational Therapy remained $193.99/hour year under NDIS.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Submission 187

Equivalent Australian Insurance Schemes:

DVA Rehabilitation - $225.58/hour plus GST
SA Workers Compensation - $234.90/hour plus GST
Comcare - $225.58/hour plus GST
Workcover WA - $227.25/hour plus GST Private rates for Occupational Therapists in Australia range from $200/hour to ~$250/hour plus GST. The Medicare rebate amount is based on a typical rate of $217/hour.

The Government’s actions regarding transparency, preferred providers,

temporary registration: The Government has withheld an Independent Pricing Report despite compulsion to release it. They commissioned private advice instead after withholding this report due to lack of transparency history. Now introducing ‘preferred providers’, limiting participant choice & control – original tenet NDIS lacks. Also about historically expensive mandatory registration removing small and sole Providers who make up most NDPSA (NDIS) Providers globally. Government claims Mandatory Registration increases service quality, reduces fraud, enhances safety. There’s no evidence supporting these assertions; there are mixed Registered/NonRegistered Providers accused or convicted (redacted: s22(1)(a)(ii)). Significant backlash exists among participants against reducing their Choice Control over Providers by the government agenda.

This justification led cutting SCP funding 50% and CB support down -10 percent!!

No direct link provided between Therapeutic Interventions and Participant function/social community participation. Not solely therapists’ responsibility Data not collected/measured; only assumption/opinion. The role in improving functional capacity includes other parties like General Practitioners, Medical Specialists etc., dependent on life stages and individual choices within the program.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Other health or disability factors may not be accepted under the NDIS.
Random life events can hinder progress towards achieving NDIA goals without sufficient resources being available within a defined period (funding periods). This has rendered Therapeutic Supports ineffective if they cannot provide adequate service in such circumstances; e.g., how does one Occupational Therapist manage with just one hour per month allocated into monthly funding cycles when travel costs make it impractical to address environment-specific objectives?
NDIS requests multiple Functional Assessment Reports instead of Progress Reports which results in data collection gaps;
The NDIS lacks clear templates specifically designed functional reports tailored explicitly toward occupational therapists, such that other insurance schemes like Workers Compensation, DVA & Comcare offer simpler reporting formats requiring less medicolegal evidence than what is currently expected from Allied Health Professionals’ opinions and internal professional advice provided through claims management processes directly between professionals themselves rather than via intermediaries thereby significantly reducing delays while ensuring collaborative decision-making among stakeholders.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Section: The Government’s push to imply NDIS as ‘welfare’ not an Insurance Scheme.

By doing this, it garners public support for cost-cuts rather than emphasizes rights of NDIS Participants to appropriate support commensurate with what non-disabled population lives; these cuts are then enshrined without public resistance;

Subsection:

Paragraphs:

Ensures all Australian Citizens benefit from collected taxes/excises/other government incomes—not just big business/top 1% rich people;
Framing NDIC as “cost blowout” despite Per Capita analysis showing $1 spent returns $2.25 in economy—a positive impact also—NDIS participants aren’t a line item;

List Items:

Limited/no benefits on carers;
Carer Payment difficult to get;
Carers Allowance barely helpful ($70/wk);
Taxation reductions don’t improve living costs for working hard but unpaid carers;
Inadequate disability supports force out-of-work carers reducing tax revenue/productivity/skill losses due to discrimination against professions;
Losses family income lead poverty/homelessness;
Lack superannuation secure future;
Increased risk abuse stuck homes financial insecurity;
Exhausted carers increase use health mental child safety housing justice costs;
Largest contributors GDP receive least return Government.

Section: The Government has reclassified rights into ‘welfare’.

The Old Age Pension earned through paying taxes is no longer considered pension; Public Aged Care Placements largely non-existent or extremely limited, DVA support not right service country welfare.

Subsection:

Paragraphs:

Support Life was original intent of scheme at great risk new legislation whim NDIS Minister carte blanche change any aspect legislation anytime; The NDIC supposed prevent constant need prove your disability retell traumatic history.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

9.3.

The NDIS started out accepting clinical evidence in short reports, which quickly evolved to medicolegal report requirements at great expense as NDIs Planners continuously said ‘not enough evidence’ and frequently changed goalposts. Many therapists have reported working extensively for free to minimize costs while billing many hours than they bill.
NDIS Minister admitted planners don’t read therapist reports; blamed themersists writing ‘too long’ reports yet it was driven trend longer cost compared progress or less frequent Functional Capacity reporting requirements of NDIS. Long delays particularly urgent Change Circumstance applications has led some participants dying before receiving outcome I doubt investigated. The Government reduced plans cohorts such that effectively lose their supports life due funding constraints increasing prices services except therapies despite clear no decrease support needs.

Governments increasing push for Participants mainstream supports requiring undisclosed “treatments” attempted accessing regardless whether accessible appropriate affordable.

New legislation strengthens limits on responsibilities other agencies involved with obligation work concert collaboratively systems optimal outcomes not only about cutting but also participant’s rights.

Legislation does allow remote regional locations without services lack financial affordability excuse engaging treatments deemed required access granted.

While insurance schemes tend caveat another scheme responsible instead provides support risk complexity faced by NDIS Participant people disabilities incumbent independent thorough assessment regarding refusing excluding reducing Plan funding supports changes made globally whole cohort should be completed.

####### There is mention in the legislation Specialist reports indicating treatment inappropriate contraindicated MAY considered at discretion Clinical opinion override Determinations case. ######## NDIs and need transparent what prospective must complete these equitably accessible location, means religious

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

and cultural beliefs, medical appropriateness, and also needs to address issues around Applicants not having evidence of past treatments due to time past, not being given a report, loss by fire or relationship breakdown, or any other number of reasons due to ‘life’. 10.6: NDIS and therefore the Government has not been meeting its obligations regarding interagency collaboration, and this will continue under this new legislation. 10.7: Often these so-called mainstream supports do not exist or cannot be accessed due to exclusion criteria. The NDIS does not care now and will double down on this with the new legislation. 10.8: The Government has attempted to re-label Capacity Building Supports and other supports as ‘health system responsibility’, ‘education responsibility’, ‘child safety responsibility’ or ‘housing responsibility’ without any attempt to work WITH those systems to ensure the NDIS Participant does not fall through the gaps in systems. There is nothing in this legislation to address this. 10.9: Re-labelling supports as “not NDIS responsibility” contributes to poor outcomes for NDIS Participants, which the NDIS then seeks to blame elsewhere. It also now forms part of the legislation to increase options to exclude participants.

The NDIS operates as if they have no duty of care not to harm NDIS Participants when refusing NDIS Supports or NDIS Access or expelling NDIS Participants from the NDIS; main stream services do not exist (e.g., GP Mental Health Management Plans are used only by Autism Psychology access). Removal children from NDIS Early Intervention despite no other support being available community). 10.11: The NDIS never provided appropriate transitionary support between schemes during plan funding changes ensuring ongoing support transitions Changes plans exited NDIS abrupt often less than 24 hour’s notice transitional support funding.

**Government’s lack transparency means compel it:*

Transparency essential maximise buy-in stakeholders enable genuine co-design proposed legislation ensure participant and provider safety be held accountable evidence-based unbiased legislation rules guidelines instruments human rights right appeals procedural justice. Why abandoned NDIS Review recommendations Why accepted recommendations Disability Royal Commission Planned reforms eking out tidbits occasionally grey areas refuse clarify affected stakeholder,

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Submission 187

Planned Legislative Changes Without Meaningful Consultation or Co-Design

Planned legislative changes appear well planned ahead of notification without meaningful consultation; genuine co-design is absent. Without sufficient time to respond, such consultations remain unanswered.

Releasing Relevant Investigations & Reports

Releases include: Internal/external communications/reports or so-called ‘independent’ analyses/report releases.

Plans For NDIS Pricing As Market Stewards

Plans involve market stewardship roles requiring ample notice provided to providers regarding pricing changes; inadequate public disclosure remains a concern for this aspect as well.

Independent Pricing Report Hidden From Public View

The independent pricing report, which should be made available publicly due its importance in informing policy decisions related directly with funding allocations under the scheme’s framework, has been kept hidden from view. This lack transparency raises concerns about accountability within government processes governing such critical financial matters affecting individuals and organizations involved through their participation on the disability community platform.

Legal Implications Analysis Of Proposed Legislation

Any legal implications analysis concerning proposed legislation must also be disclosed fully by governments responsible for implementing these reforms. This includes any internal or external risk assessments completed specifically considering perspectives relevant both inside communities affected (disability participants) alongside those outside them (NDIS). The absence thereof may indicate an attempt at secrecy surrounding potential impacts upon stakeholders who stand most likely impacted financially or otherwise negatively by legislative amendments intended to alter existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments of similar nature.

Beneficiaries Disclosure Under Reform Proposals

Disclosure requirements around beneficiaries receiving funds allocated towards reform proposals need clarification especially when it comes down to specific instances where smaller entities might face closure following implementation of new policies aimed primarily toward consolidation efforts among larger corporations operating across multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based operations serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking than others located further away physically distant locations requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Government’s Use Of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs)

The government must not have the right enforce non-disclosure agreements on organizations and individuals meeting secretly to discuss legislation changes. This practice undermines transparency, accountability, can be used improperly for political purposes when it comes down to who gets invited onto key committees shaping future direction of policy development efforts aimed at creating new laws governing disability services sector; such actions may also lead towards exclusionary practices where certain groups are systematically marginalized while others receive undue influence disproportionate representation granted them unfairly based upon criteria established arbitrarily chosen ad hoc basis lacking sufficient justification behind decisions made regarding inclusion versus exclusions applied across boardroom table discussions held regularly during meetings convened periodically as part normal routine operations conducted internally among staff members employed full-time within respective departments tasked specifically assigned responsibility overseeing implementation details pertaining directly related matters concerning public health welfare interests served broadly speaking rather than narrowly focused solely around narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Government Should Be Transparent About Who Gets Involved In Policy Development Efforts

The government must be transparent about who gets a seat at the policy development table to ensure procedural fairness. This includes genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representing diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted by legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation efforts among larger corporations operating across multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based operations serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking than others located further away physically distant locations requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

The government’s growing use refusals redactions for freedom information applications related to ndis activities reforms prevents public media holding them accountable. This practice undermines transparency, accountability, can be used improperly political purposes when it comes down who gets invited onto key committees shaping future direction policy development efforts aimed creating new laws governing disability services sector; such actions may also lead towards exclusionary practices where certain groups are systematically marginalized while others receive undue influence disproportionate representation granted unfairly based upon criteria established arbitrarily chosen ad hoc basis lacking sufficient justification behind decisions made regarding inclusion versus exclusions applied across boardroom table discussions held regularly during meetings convened periodically as part normal routine operations conducted internally among staff members employed full-time within respective departments tasked specifically assigned responsibility overseeing implementation details pertaining directly relation matters concerning public health welfare interests served broadly speaking rather than narrowly focused solely around narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Government’s Use Of Misleading Phrases To Incite Public Suspicion And Hatred Against People With Disabilities Or NDIS Providers

The government’s use of phrases such “over-diagnosis”, return to the original intent scheme mild moderate developmental delay autism fraud grifters rorters scoundrels etc are unfounded non evidence based misinformation inciting widespread suspicion hatred against people disability ndis providers. This practice undermines trust, confidence, can be used improperly political purposes when it comes down who gets invited onto key committees shaping future direction policy development efforts aimed creating new laws governing disability services sector; such actions may also lead towards exclusionary practices where certain groups systematically marginalized while others receive undue influence disproportionate representation granted unfairly based upon criteria established arbitrarily chosen ad hoc basis lacking sufficient justification behind decisions made regarding inclusion versus exclusions applied across boardroom table discussions held regularly during meetings convened periodically as part normal routine operations conducted internally among staff members employed full-time within respective departments tasked specifically assigned responsibility overseeing implementation details pertaining directly relation matters concerning public health welfare interests served broadly speaking rather than narrowly focused solely around narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Labor Government’s Use Of Misleading Narratives And Phrases To Justify NDIS Legislative Reform And Funding Cuts Affecting Participants Negatively

The labor government’s use of specific narratives and phrases recommended Redbridge Group palatable to engender support ndis cuts repeatedly used mainstream media articles justify ndis legislative reform funding cuts that affect negatively participants. This practice undermines trust, confidence, can be used improperly political purposes when it comes down who gets invited onto key committees shaping future direction policy development efforts aimed creating new laws governing disability services sector; such actions may also lead towards exclusionary practices where certain groups systematically marginalized while others receive undue influence disproportionate representation granted unfairly based upon criteria established arbitrarily chosen ad hoc basis lacking sufficient justification behind decisions made regarding inclusion versus exclusions applied across boardroom table discussions held regularly during meetings convened periodically as part normal routine operations conducted internally among staff members employed full-time within respective departments tasked specifically assigned responsibility overseeing implementation details pertaining directly relation matters concerning public health welfare interests served broadly speaking rather than narrowly focused solely around narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Claims That Widespread Fraud, Grifters And Rorters Are Taking Taxpayers’ Money/Costing Too Much

Claims that widespread fraud grifters rorters both participants providers are taking taxpayers money costing too much. This practice undermines trust, can be used improperly political purposes when it comes down who gets invited onto key committees shaping future direction policy development efforts aimed creating new laws governing disability services sector; such actions may also lead towards exclusionary practices where certain groups systematically marginalized while others receive undue influence disproportionate representation granted unfairly based upon criteria established arbitrarily chosen ad hoc basis lacking sufficient justification behind decisions made regarding inclusion versus exclusions applied across boardroom table discussions held regularly during meetings convened periodically as part normal routine operations conducted internally among staff members employed full-time within respective departments tasked specifically assigned responsibility overseeing implementation details pertaining directly relation matters concerning public health welfare interests served broadly speaking rather than narrowly focused solely around narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion And Recommendations For Improvement In Government Practices Regarding NDIS Reform Efforts:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representing diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation efforts larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Conclusion:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectively representative diverse perspectives encompassing those affected most deeply financially and otherwise negatively impacted legislative amendments intended altering existing frameworks established previously via prior enactments similar nature aimed primarily toward consolidation larger corporations operating multiple sectors including healthcare services provided remotely online versus locally based serving local populations more closely connected geographically speaking others located further away physically distant requiring greater travel time commitments between points A & B respectively depending largely off individual circumstances unique per person case basis considerations taken into account during initial assessment phase before final decision made regarding whether particular entity should continue operation under current terms agreed beforehand amongst all parties concerned collectively as group representing broader interests served overall rather than narrow self-interests pursued singularly without regard given equally weighted importance placed elsewhere else within system designed originally from ground up with input sought directly involved individuals themselves participating actively throughout entire process leading ultimately resulting in successful outcomes achieved together collaboratively through collective effort expended working hand-in-hand side-by-side day-to-day over extended period spanning several years continuously improving quality service delivery standards maintained consistently year after another ensuring best possible care continues being delivered reliably every single minute hour day week month regardless external factors beyond control affecting daily lives experienced by millions people living independently despite challenges faced everyday due various disabilities limiting mobility or other physical limitations.

Recommendations:

The government must ensure transparency, accountability, collaboration genuine co-design efforts involving broad range of representatives drawn collectiv```json(application/json)({

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Submission 187

Section 12: Claims Regarding NDIS Early Intervention

Claim: Over-diagnosis of Autism for ‘Level 2’ access.
Claim: Children with mild-to-moderate developmental delay and autism don’t qualify under original scheme intent; downplays early investment’s value on long-term costs reduction/adulthood.
Counterclaim/Clarification: Original intention was always Early Intervention per section [reference number].
- Subpoint A: Insufficient time to reap benefits from intervention investments;
- Subpoint B: NDIS rolled out slowly since 2013 primarily targeting children aged ~~3–6 years old who would now be between ages~~16—19 due to exit criteria at age seven, typically transitioning into adulthood challenges requiring further support in areas like education, work, disability employment/volunteering.

Subsection C: Misleading claims leading to premature removals from NDIs while Thriving Kids (receiving less funding) is not operational yet, plans include removing evidence-based natural environment interventions favoring parental education over specialized care.

Subsubsection D: Lack of investment compared to NDIS Early Intervention will lead future higher costs as more young adults enter the system. This can only be prevented by stricter eligibility requirements/funding cuts/caps participant numbers.

Section 12: Additional Claims Regarding Autism Diagnosis Levels

Claims that most removed (~160k) for ‘Thriving Kids’ have mild-to-moderate developmental delay and autism are unfounded based on DSM-5 terminology/levels misuse/misinterpretation which do not indicate severity or level of need; rather they represent varying levels of support required depending upon individual needs within a safe home setting representing Level I versus significant environmental demands necessitating greater assistance during life transitions such starting school/higher ed/work/volunteer activities indicating Level III.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

Section 5: Autism Levels vs Funding Determination

While this scenario can lead a person receiving diagnosis Level ‘average’ in autism being granted automatic entry into NDIS under current legislation. Functional capacity & support needs are independently assessed currently via Allied Health Professionals which then determines funding level; Autism levels alone should never determine funding; Flexibility when supports used is essential based on environmental factors fluctuating capacities.

Claims about Sustainability:

The Government’s continued focus causing cost blowout appears misleading discriminatory may be misfeasance; Significant Early Intervention investment was original intent but marketed otherwise Labor; SIL/SDA costs biggest expense per participant scheme whole benefits larger Registered organisations placed optimal position to engage significant fraud negligence harm participants given findings similar organizations Royal Commission.

State and Territory Services Closure:

Claims that States Territories closed disability services creating NDIS as single solution move towards Nationally Consistent Framework due failures inequitable access of State Territorial disability services - government wants us return block funding doesn’t meet individualised needs Participants create more gaps NDIS Participants fall through?

Standardized Assessments:

Claims standardized assessments or algorithm use determining plan funding fairer consistent rather than individualized with human oversight acceptance objective clinical assessment advice qualified Allied Health professionals specialists.

Support Needs Assessment Tool Algorithm-Based:

Claims the tool developed into an algorithm-based by modifying such I-CAN CIQ-R evidence-based not so stated in document text provided for this submission.

Section 10: Provider Registration Concerns

Claims provider registration will improve Participant safety quality service outcomes has no evidential basis; Registered Providers have committed fraud harmed participants directly accessing funds without human oversight unlike Unregistered providers who are overseen by Participants Plan Managers. NDIS introduced automatic artificial intelligence scanning incoming invoices all however if invoice has no

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Submission 187

errors and falls within Participant budgets; can easily pass without scrutiny. Claim: Funding for Social & Community plan funding too much requires a cut in half defies findings from Royal Commission:

Risk: Participants stuck home/institutionalised/SIL-like housing,
Social isolation/reduced wellbeing/abuse/more use Federal-State-Territory-funded outside NDIS/NDSI participants/carers/families/former small/sole NDSP employees due bankruptcy/business closures,
Loss employment income/Centrelink payments/NNDP participants/carers/families/small/sole NDSP employee owners/bankruptcy/business closure,
Participants unable attend appointments/tertiary study/work/volunteering/social activities/community social advocacy/groups/treatment groups/everyday non-disabled people take granted/daily hours weekday ($26,000)/weekday evenings or weekends/respite.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill

Submission: Submission-187

achieving sustainable study or employment outcomes for people with disabilities. No meaningful alternatives are on offer, that has proven better results compared to NDIS. It’s interesting both UK & USA use extremely similar arguments to cut government funded services for disabled individuals, creating overdiagnosed Autism narrative, imposing greater ‘controls’ surveillance, eroding privacy rights concurrently in Australia too. some Australian articles show how these nations market Autism as costly, over diagnosed, using Government funds excessively:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/dec/07/adhd-autism-overdiagnosis-wes-streeting (UK article)
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2025/09/advocate-autism-wave-misinformation US article Correcting Misinformation About Autism - points out Administration misinformation and policy shifts creating stigma justifying surveillance undermining care.
http://autism.org.uk/blog/challenging-misinformation-about-autism-using-evidence-to-correct-false-claims UK article by Dr Judith Brown
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4232964/ US research Gernsbacher Dawson Goldsmith Three Reasons Not To Believe In An Autism Epidemic 2005 an older piece addressing the autism epidemic myth together with other sources showing similar narratives suggesting collusion for unclear agenda.

Doubts about Labor & LNP’s genuine support of NDIS reforms:

similar arguments used in USA&UK to justify disability funding cuts legislative changes seem farfetched, collusion between countries is possible due to identical narrative elements like ‘fraud’, over-diagnosed, describing as brain disorder or illness rather than neurodivergence mild moderate severe implying less need for support diagnosis excuse not trying unsustainability ignoring real reasons behind increased diagnoses.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Submission 187

https://quickclaim.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/NDIS-Fraud-Crackdown-Spending-and-Outcomes-1.pdf) The following expenditure data are presented according to an analysis conducted between October 3rd - November 4th.

Spending Breakdown Over Time:

$26.5 million initial investment allocated from September/October ’21 until December’22 towards investigating fraud & non-compliance within compliance pilot programs at NDIA;
$58,500k was budgeted in FY 22-'23 (split across multiple agencies totaling $126m).
$49M spent directly with NDIA during fiscal year '23-'``24.
$161M designated specifically toward NDISQSC’s operations over '24-'```25 period, similarly for another $90M directed solely into NDIA funding for the same timeframe (FY 24-'25). Additionally, a further allocation of $110 M occurred by Dec.’24.

Further expenditures include additional funds dedicated exclusively as part of the fraud program ($17.1M) and maintaining integrity workforce costs ($151M). The total amount cited is $495 m, but it should be noted that this figure only accounts up till Nov.’24; an extra $747 .7M has been reported to have been expended on NDIS, QSCS, and Services Australia collectively between 2021-2024, including proposed spending beyond next financial years.

Additional Costs:

The cost associated Redbridge Group’s services contributing towards creating fraudulent narratives adds approximately $895 million. This includes any potential mismanagement or errors identified in internal reviews conducted within FY 23-'24 which led to incorrect debts being raised requiring repayment (totaling around $145k). Thus far, these factors elevate overall expenditure related directly with NDIS Fraud Administration totaling nearly $895m.

Recovery from Frauds:

$132 Million recovered due non-compliance issues at short-term accommodation providers;
Operation Pegasus resulted in convictions for three individuals costing a further $576K;
Tilbury case reparation order amounted another $214 K Forecast savings announced by the government are not included as they haven’t materialized yet. After accounting all expenditures mentioned above, it’s concluded that despite having spent over $895 m, recovery efforts yielded only about $132 M thus far ($132 .``M) is what has actually been recouped so-far.

Quoted Insights From Document:

Enforcement activity surged significantly; FFT initiated > investigations and referred more than fifty cases to prosecution resulting high-profile conviction & imprisonment sentences.“”(p p 1) “> The ANAO also highlighted an accountability failure noting NDIA “has failed reporting against its commitments regarding savings made within this framework to both Government or Disability Reform Ministerial Council”, suggesting transparency concerns exist surrounding agency operations during crackdowns on fraud activities.” (pp 1).

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment

Submission: 187

Its own performance against commitments it made.

(pp6)

Core argument on fraud focus:

The government’s intense focus on fraud, vital but overemphasized in public debate,

Impact of proposed legislation on autistic children and support services (Family or carer experience)

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

ZR - Aged 20: NDIS Participant Since 2019 For Autism Level 2

Personal and Professional Impacts on My Children and on My Carer Role Due To The Proposed Legislation Changes:

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2023

Capacity Building Supports (cut)

Social Community Participation funding cut (▼) The ‘original intent of NDIS’ promote inclusion community study employment access participation increases spending for economic

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

The Government placing political policy ahead:

Removal comprehensive safeguards participant human rights proposed legislation

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

The Government being biased market stewards removing independence

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Section: Use of Redbridge Group before NDIS Review completed

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

The Government is effectively removing ‘support for life’.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

The Government’s lack of transparency without means to compel it.

The Minister’s protection prevents seeking justice from big business defaming professionals or services harming stakeholder interests.

The Government lacks genuine co-design disability community:

The Government uses phrases such as over-diagnosis return scheme mild moderate developmental delay autism fraud grifters rorters scoundrels etc., which are largely unfounded non-evidence based misinformation inciting public suspicion hatred for individuals and Providers.

Additional Details

The use of Algorithms without human oversight for NDIS Assessments and

Environment – Internal (body) physical, intellectual, neurological,

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Key life transitions - starting school, leaving school, starting tertiary study, volunteering, getting and keeping a job, getting married,

Algorithms cannot consider:

Concurrent Disabilities-

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

The significant increase in Ministerial powers to modify the NDIS legislation:

Use non-evidence-based Support Needs Assessments by non-clinical planners determine Plan Funding biased physical disabilities.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Work in what is touted to be ‘toxic culture’ biased against people with disabilities

Reduction of Social and Community Participation funding

Removal of comprehensive safeguards of NDIS Participant Rights Human Rights from legislation

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

The Government’s actions regarding transparency, preferred providers,

No Evidence Capacity Building Therapy Supports Increased Functionality or Social Community Participation:

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Section: The Government’s push to imply NDIS as ‘welfare’ not an Insurance Scheme.

Subsection:

Paragraphs:

List Items:

Section: The Government has reclassified rights into ‘welfare’.

Subsection:

Paragraphs:

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Governments increasing push for Participants mainstream supports requiring undisclosed “treatments” attempted accessing regardless whether accessible appropriate affordable.

New legislation strengthens limits on responsibilities other agencies involved with obligation work concert collaboratively systems optimal outcomes not only about cutting but also participant’s rights.

Legislation does allow remote regional locations without services lack financial affordability excuse engaging treatments deemed required access granted.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026

*Government’s lack transparency means compel it:

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2026

Planned Legislative Changes Without Meaningful Consultation or Co-Design

Releasing Relevant Investigations & Reports

Plans For NDIS Pricing As Market Stewards

Independent Pricing Report Hidden From Public View

Legal Implications Analysis Of Proposed Legislation

Beneficiaries Disclosure Under Reform Proposals

Government’s Use Of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs)

Government Should Be Transparent About Who Gets Involved In Policy Development Efforts

Government’s Growing Use Of Refusals And Redactions For Freedom of Information Applications Regarding NDIS Related Activities and Reforms Preventing Public Accountability

Government’s Use Of Misleading Phrases To Incite Public Suspicion And Hatred Against People With Disabilities Or NDIS Providers

Labor Government’s Use Of Misleading Narratives And Phrases To Justify NDIS Legislative Reform And Funding Cuts Affecting Participants Negatively

Claims That Widespread Fraud, Grifters And Rorters Are Taking Taxpayers’ Money/Costing Too Much

Conclusion And Recommendations For Improvement In Government Practices Regarding NDIS Reform Efforts:

Recommendations:

Conclusion:

Recommendations:

Conclusion:

Recommendations:

Conclusion:

Recommendations:

Conclusion:

Recommendations:

Conclusion:

**Government’s lack transparency means compel it:*