Complex disability support needs and sleep deprivation (Family or carer experience)

‹ PrevPage 1 of 5 · Source p. 1Next ›

Submission 864

Submission to the NDIS Future Generations Bill 2026

Regarding the potential impact on people with severe and complex disabilities

My name is . I am the mother and long-term carer of my daughter , is a a person living with severe and complex disability. I am writing this submission because I am deeply concerned about how the proposed NDIS Future Generations Bill 2026 may impact people like , both now and into the future.

is amazing young woman who has a tremendous impact on her family, friends and community. She is valued human being.

I ask that decision makers carefully consider the real-life consequences this legislation may have on people with high and complex support needs, and on the families who support them every day.

For many people, disability policy is discussed in financial terms, budgets, and systems. But for families like ours, these decisions directly affect safety, health, communication, dignity, independence, and quality of life.

’s support needs are not optional or temporary. They are lifelong, complex, and require highly individualised support.

Understanding ’s Disability and Support Needs

lives with severe and complex disability requiring significant daily support across all areas of life. She requires consistent, skilled, one-to-one support to safely participate in her home and community.

’s disability affects:

 Communication

 Emotional regulation

 Decision making

 Safety awareness

 Daily living skills

 Sleep

 Community access

 Social connection

 Personal care and routines

uses multiple forms of communication, including AAC and supported communication methods. Staff and family require ongoing training and consistency to understand her communication and support her safely.

Submission 864

Changes to support structures, unfamiliar workers, reduced hours, or inflexible funding models can have major impacts on ’s wellbeing and safety.

Risks if the Bill Results in Reduced Flexibility or Supports

I am concerned that the proposed changes may reduce the flexibility needed to support people with severe disabilities in ways that are safe and effective.

People like do not fit into standardised systems.

Supports often need to change quickly depending on:

 Sleep deprivation

 Health changes

 Behavioural distress

 Community risks

 Staffing issues

 Communication breakdowns

 Mental and emotional wellbeing

If funding becomes more rigid, harder to access, or based on generic assumptions rather than individual needs, the result could be serious harm.

Real-Life Examples of Potential Risks

Sleep Deprivation and Escalation

Recently experienced multiple nights with almost no sleep over a five-day period. During these periods, her support needs increase significantly.

Sleep deprivation impacts:

 Emotional regulation

 Communication

 Physical safety

 Ability to participate in daily life

 Risk of distress and escalation

During these times we require increased staffing, flexible support responses, and highly experienced workers.

If supports are delayed, reduced, or restricted under new funding rules, ’s distress could escalate to the point where:

 Hospital presentations increase

Submission 864

 Emergency services are involved

 Mental health systems become involved

 Family breakdown and carer burnout occur

This does not save money. It simply shifts costs to other government systems while causing trauma to the person and family.

Communication Supports Are Essential, Not Optional

requires consistent support workers who understand her communication methods.

If the Bill leads to:

 Reduced staffing flexibility

 Lower funding levels

 Increased use of unfamiliar agency staff

 Restrictions on training supports

then ’s ability to communicate her needs safely will reduce.

When a person cannot communicate effectively:

 Anxiety increases

 Frustration increases

 Behavioural distress can increase

 Health issues may go unnoticed

 Safeguarding risks increase

Communication is not a luxury. It is fundamental to safety, human rights, and dignity.

The Hidden Cost of Inadequate Supports

One of my biggest concerns is that this Bill may unintentionally increase long-term costs to government systems.

When proper disability supports are not provided:

 Hospital admissions increase

 Crisis accommodation may be needed

 Police and emergency services become involved

 Mental health systems carry additional pressure

 Families experience burnout

 Informal supports collapse

Submission 864

For people with severe disability, prevention is far more effective and humane than crisis response.

The NDIS was designed to provide reasonable and necessary supports so people could live safely in the community and avoid exactly these outcomes.

Families Already Carry Significant Responsibility

Families like ours already provide enormous unpaid support.

We coordinate:

 Rosters

 Communication systems

 Medical appointments

 Behavioural supports

 Staff training

 Daily routines

 Advocacy

 Crisis management

 Community participation

Without flexible NDIS supports, much of this responsibility becomes unmanageable.

Many ageing parents and carers are terrified about the future for their sons and daughters if systems become harder to navigate or supports become more restricted.

People With Severe Disabilities Must Not Be Forgotten

There is growing discussion about sustainability of the NDIS. I understand governments must manage public spending responsibly.

However, sustainability cannot come at the expense of the safety and wellbeing of people with the highest support needs.

People with severe and complex disability are often the least visible in these discussions because they cannot easily advocate for themselves.

I ask that the Government ensure:

 Individual needs remain central to planning

 Flexibility remains available for complex circumstances

 Communication supports are protected

 Families and lived experience are genuinely listened to

Submission 864

 High support needs are not forced into standardised funding models

 Prevention and early support remain priorities

Final Comments

People like deserve the same rights as everyone else:

 To feel safe

 To communicate

 To participate in community life

 To have meaningful relationships

 To live with dignity

 To have a future

The NDIS has allowed many people with severe disabilities to live fuller and safer lives in their communities.

I strongly urge the Government to carefully consider the unintended consequences this Bill may have for people with severe and complex disabilities and the families who support them.

Once vital supports are reduced or lost, the damage can be significant and very difficult to reverse.

Thank you for considering this submission.