Our reference: FOI 24/25-1491
GPO Box 700 Canberra ACT 2601 1800 800 110 ndis.gov.au
29 April 2025
Me
By email: foi+request-12894-58637bac@righttoknow.org.au
Dear Me
Freedom of Information request — Notice of Decision
Thank you for your correspondence of 7 March 2025, seeking access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request.
Scope of your request
You have requested access to the following documents:
“I request a copy of the following TAB articles (see FOI 23/24-1189):
Cost comparison of Computer and Fitness Products
Definition early intervention
Neurofeedback therapy
Obesity
Weight management interventions
Sexual activity supports
Recreational supports - off road cycles
Evidence based treatments for OA
Lifespan of communication devices
Determining personal care hours for a range of tasks
Neurofeedback for ADHD
Takeaway / eating out habits of Australians
- Benefits of sexual activity in women.”
As you have already been sent some documents via administrative release, you agreed to revise the scope of your request to be for the following documents:
- Obesity
- Recreational supports - off road cycles
- Evidence based treatments for OA
- Lifespan of communication devices
- Neurofeedback for ADHD
Timeframe
A 30-day statutory period for processing your request commenced from 8 March 2025 in accordance with section 15(5)(b) of the FOI Act. The due date for a decision on access was 7 April 2025. I note this time has lapsed and as a result we are deemed to have refused your request under section 15AC of the FOI Act.
Despite this, I have continued to process your application. I apologise for the delay and confirm that you retain your right to seek external review of this decision.
Decision on access to documents
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.
I have identified 5 documents, which fall within the scope of your request.
The documents were identified by the TAPIB who conducted searches of NDIA’s systems, using all reasonable search terms that could return documents relevant to your request, and consulting with relevant NDIA staff who could be expected to be able to identify documents within the scope of the request.
I have decided to grant access to 5 documents in part.
In reaching my decision, I took the following into account:
- your correspondence outlining the scope of your request
- the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request
- the FOI Act
- the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act
- consultation with relevant NDIA staff
- factors relevant to my assessment of whether or not disclosure would be in the public interest
- the NDIA’s operating environment and functions.
Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant material deleted (section 22)
I have decided that Document 1 contains material that is exempt from disclosure under the FOI Act.
I have also identified that Documents 1 to 5 contains material that is irrelevant to your request. The irrelevant material relates to names and contact details of NDIA staff which is not relevant to the subject matter of your request.
In accordance with section 22 of the FOI Act, I have considered whether it is possible to delete the exempt and irrelevant material from the documents and have concluded that it is reasonably practicable to do so. Accordingly, I have prepared an edited copy of the documents with the exempt and irrelevant material removed.
Reasons for decision
Personal privacy (section 47F)
Section 47F of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document(s) if its disclosure would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information about any person (including a deceased person).
I have identified material in Document 1 which contains personal information of a third party / third parties.
Under section 47F(2) of the FOI Act, in determining whether the disclosure of documents would involve unreasonable disclosure of personal information, regard must be had to:
a. the extent to which the information is well known;
b. whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
c. the availability of the information from publicly accessible sources; and
d. any other matters that the agency considers relevant.
Against these criteria, I take the view that:
a. it is apparent from the information that an individual is identifiable; and
b. the information referred to above is not readily available from publicly accessible sources.
With reference to the assessment above, it would be unreasonable to disclose publicly this personal information and is therefore conditionally exempt under section 47F(1) of the FOI Act.
Public interest considerations – section 47F
Section 11A(5) of the FOI Act provides that access to a document covered by a conditional exemption must be provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest.
I have not considered any of the irrelevant factors as set out under section 11B(4) of the FOI Act in making this decision.
In favour of disclosure, I have considered the factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI Act, and I have determined that disclosure of the relevant information in Document 1 would promote the objects of the FOI Act by providing access to documents held by the government and providing access to information.
Against disclosure, I consider that disclosure of the relevant information in Document 1:
- would not contribute to the publication of information of sufficient public interest to justify the likely harm caused by release
- would not enhance Australia’s representative democracy in the ways described in section 11B(3) of the FOI Act
- would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance, or promote oversight of public expenditure.
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt under section 47F of the FOI Act, the harm that would result from disclosure is that it could reasonably be expected to:
- affect an individual’s right to privacy by having their personal information in the public domain.
In summary, I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the factors in favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest to release this information to you. Accordingly, I have decided that the relevant information in Document 1 is exempt under section 47F of the FOI Act.
Release of documents
The documents for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at Attachment A, are enclosed.
Rights of review
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at Attachment B.
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at fox@xxxx.xxx.xx.
Yours sincerely
Kate (KIM627) A/Assistant Director – Freedom of Information Non Personals Team Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch Reviews and Information Release Division
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents for FOI 24/25-1491
| Document number | Page number | Description | Access Decision | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-13 | Research – Lifespan of Communication Devices Date: 19 February 2021 |
PARTIAL ACCESS Exemption claimed: s47F – personal privacy |
Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 2 | 14-24 | Research – Osteoarthritis (OA): Evidence Based Treatments Date: 18 January 2021 |
PARTIAL ACCESS | Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 3 | 25-40 | Research – Neuro-feedback therapy for ADHD Date: 9 April 2021 |
PARTIAL ACCESS | Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 4 | 41-62 | Research – Recreational Supports: Off Road Cycles Date: 26 November 2020 |
PARTIAL ACCESS | Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 5 | 63-99 | Research Request – Syndromic obesity & causative link to disability Date: December 2019 |
PARTIAL ACCESS | Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
Attachment B
Your review rights
As this matter was a deemed refusal, internal review of this decision is not an option. However, if you have concern with any aspect of this decision, please contact the NDIA FOI team by email foi@ndis.gov.au or by post:
Freedom of Information Section Complaints Management & FOI Branch General Counsel Division National Disability Insurance Agency GPO Box 700 CANBERRA ACT 2601
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision.
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways:
- Online: www.oaic.gov.au
- Post: GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001
- Email: enquiries@oaic.gov.au
- Phone: 1300 363 992 (local call charge)
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the Commonwealth Ombudsman
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request.
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to:
- Phone: 1300 362 072 (local call charge)
- Email: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.