Our reference: FOI 25/26-1226 (LEXD 12090)
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601
1800 800 110 24 September 2026 ndis.gov.au
Meran
Right to Know
By email: foi+request-13986-446988c2@righttoknow.org.au
Dear Meran
Freedom of Information request — Notice of Decision
Thank you for your correspondence of 8 November 2025, in which you requested access
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National
Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request.
Scope of your request
You requested access to the following documents:
“In accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, please
provide IN FULL all documents held by your Agency which are CURRENT, NON
PUBLICLY AVAILABLE, and address:
- The exact data points which determine what the Agency accepts as “substantially reduced functional capacity” in each of the six areas mentioned in s24(1)(c):
communication, social interaction, learning, mobility, self-care & self-management.
(Example: The Agency has argued in ART that an individual who can crawl around their
home has mobility).
- The evidence base (including but not limited to high quality research and expert testimony) upon which the Agency determines the threshold for “substantially reduced
functional capacity“ in each of the six areas previously mentioned.”
Extension of time
1
On 13 November 2025, you agreed to a 30-day extension of time under section 15AA of the
FOI Act, making 7 January 2026 the date by which to provide you with a decision on your
request.
Processing period
The date by which to provide you with a decision on your request was 7 January 2026. We
have been experiencing processing delays, and were unable to provide you with a decision
by this date. Consequently, your application is deemed to have been refused under section
15AC of the FOI Act.
I note that this access decision is being released to you after the due date, and I apologise
for the delay. In the interests of not causing any further delay, I have decided not to apply for
an extension from the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) under
section 15AC of the FOI Act. This means that you are unable to seek an internal review of
this decision. However, you are able to apply to the OAIC for an external review of this
decision. Please see Attachment C for more information about your rights of review.
Search efforts
searches were conducted of NDIA business systems, using all reasonable search terms that
could return documents relevant to your request. In addition, I have consulted with relevant
NDIA staff in the Technical Advice and Practice Improvement Branch who could be
reasonably expected to be able to identify documents within the scope of your request.
As a result of these searches, I have identified 5 documents which fall within the scope of
your request.
Decision on access to documents
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act.
I have decided to grant access to 4 documents in full and refuse access to 1 document.
Reasons for decision
In reaching my decision, I have taken into account:
- your correspondence outlining the scope of your request
- the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request
- the FOI Act
- the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act 2
-
consultation with relevant NDIA staff and business areas
-
factors relevant to my assessment of whether or not disclosure of information would be in the public interest
-
the operating environment and functions of the NDIA I have decided that some information will not be released as it comprises exempt information
under section 47E of the FOI Act. I have also determined that the release of some
information would be contrary to the public interest, in accordance with section 11A(5) of the
FOI Act.
A detailed statement of reasons for my decision can be found at Attachment B.
Release of documents
The documents for release, as referred to in the schedule of documents at Attachment A,
are enclosed.
Rights of review
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at
Attachment C.
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me
by email at foi@ndis.gov.au.
Yours sincerely
Saoirse (SFG115)
Senior Freedom of Information Officer
Information Access and Privacy Branch
Reviews and Information Release Division
National Disability Insurance Agency
3
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents
FOI 25/26-1226
Document Page number Description Access Decision
number
Knowledge Article - Check eligibility – DIS – significant
1 1 – 4 FULL ACCESS
functional impact v6.0
2 5 – 27 Knowledge Article - Make an access decision v15.0 FULL ACCESS
Knowledge Article - Understand disability requirements
3 28 – 31 FULL ACCESS
v4.0
4 32 – 84 Operational Guideline - Applying to the NDIS v10.0 FULL ACCESS
REFUSE ACCESS
Exemption claimed:
5 N/A Advice Support Tool - Access
Section 47E(d) – Certain Operations of
Agencies
4
Attachment B
Statement of Reasons
FOI 25/26-1226
Conditionally exempt information contrary to the public interest
Relevant law
Under section 11A(5) of the FOI Act, access to a conditionally exempt document under
division 3 of Part IV of the FOI Act must be granted unless access to the document would,
on balance, be contrary to the public interest.
I have refused access to information located in document 1 on the basis that the information
is conditionally exempt information under section 47E(d) of the FOI Act, and that the
disclosure of the information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest.
Certain operations of agencies (section 47E)
Section 47E(d) of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document if its disclosure would, or
could reasonably be expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and
efficient conduct of the operations of an agency.
The NDIAs Advice Support Tools (the tools) are an internal resource that have been
developed for the exclusive use of Technical Advisors, allied Health Professionals engaged
by the NDIA to ensure consistency in the provision of advice to delegates of the NDIA. The
tools outline specific detail on how to determine if supports are reasonable and necessary
against a specific criterion, and the quantum / intensity / volume of the supports that a
participant should receive based on evidence provided – such as reports from therapists or
providers.
The disclosure of this information would reveal methodologies the NDIA uses to assist in
determining levels of support provided to NDIS participants, which is to better ensure that
participants receive supports that are reasonable and necessary. Any disclosure resulting in
the prejudice of the effectiveness of the Agency’s operational methods and procedures
would, or could reasonably be expected to, result in the need for the Agency to change
those methods and procedures to ensure the future effectiveness and sustainability of the
Agency and the Scheme.
I am satisfied that the release of this information would potentially result in the public
disclosure of internal methodologies that, through improper use, would, or could, lead to a
5
distortion of funding levels that would substantially and adversely affect the integrity of the
NDIS and its financial sustainability. Accordingly, I have decided that the information in all 67
documents is conditionally exempt under section 47E(d) of the FOI Act.
Public interest considerations – section 47E(d)
Section 11A(5) of the FOI Act provides that access to a document covered by a conditional
exemption must be provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest.
I have not considered any of the irrelevant factors as set out under section 11B(4) of the FOI
Act in making this decision.
Against disclosure, I consider that disclosure of the relevant information in the 67documents
-
would not contribute to the publication of information of sufficient public interest to justify the likely harm caused by release
-
would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance, or promote oversight of public expenditure.
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt
under section 47E(d) of the FOI Act, the harm that would result from disclosure is that it
could reasonably be expected to:
- provide the world at large the criteria and threshold for decisions on access levels of supports, which could be used to manipulate justifications / recommendations for
prescribed supports for participants
- risk the integrity of the decision-making framework used by Technical Advisors in the provision of recommendations for participants to receive supports that are reasonable
and necessary
- hinder the ability of Agency decision-makers to comply with their obligations and make informed decisions, which, in turn, helps to ensure the financial stability and integrity of
the National Disability Insurance Scheme
In summary, I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the
factors in favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest
to release this information to you. Accordingly, I have decided that the relevant information in
6
Attachment C
Freedom of Information request – Your review rights
As your request is deemed to have been refused under section 15AC of the FOI Act
because of processing delays, you are unable to apply for an internal review of the decision.
However, if you have concern with any aspect of this decision, please contact the NDIA FOI
team by email at foi@ndis.gov.au, or by post to:
Freedom of Information Section
Information Access and Privacy Branch
Reviews and Information Release Division
National Disability Insurance Agency
GPO Box 700
CANBERRA ACT 2601
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply for the Office of the Australian Information
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision.
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review in
writing, or by using the online merits review application form which is available on the OAIC’s
website: OAIC Review Application Form.
An application to the OAIC must be made within 60 calendar days from the date of the
deemed refusal decision, as set out in our letter to you (Notice of Decision). You may also
apply to the OAIC for an extension of this timeframe, from the date of the deemed refusal
decision until the date of your application for review.
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways:
Online: OAIC Review Application Form
Post: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
GPO Box 5218
SYDNEY NSW 2001
Email: enquiries@oaic.gov.au
Phone: 1300 363 992 (local call charge)
Website: www.oaic.gov.au
7
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the
Commonwealth Ombudsman
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about the actions
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request.
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details provided above.
Your complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to:
Phone: 1300 362 072 (local call charge)
Email: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
8
Comments
Loading comments…
Comments are temporarily disabled.