Our reference: FOI 24/25-1472 (LEXD 62798)
OAIC reference: MR25/00665
14 May 2025
Me Right to Know
By email: foi+request-12891-60acae58@righttoknow.org.au
Dear Me
Freedom of Information request — Notice of revised decision under section 55G of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
Thank you for your correspondence of 6 March 2025, in which you requested access to documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a revised decision on your request.
Scope of your request
You have requested access to the following documents:
...I request a copy of all documents that:1. Contain current advice or guidance or similar on the definition of ‘permanent’ (as used in the Act), and 2. Are not publicly available, and 3. Are not advice et al to a specific individual (for example, an email in response to a question is not included; a reference document in Teams is, even if the reference document is not a formal SOP).Where a document is in scope the request is for the whole document, not just the portion relating to impairment
I agree to the exclusion of non-SES details and applicant/participant personalinformation…`
On 16 April 2025, after a 24AB request consultation process, you confirmed via email to the following revised scope:
...I request a copy of all documents that:1. Contain current advice or guidance or similar on the definition of ‘permanent’ (as used in the Act), and 2. Are not publicly available, and`
3. Are not advice et al to a specific individual (for example, an email in response to a question is not included; a reference document in Teams is, even if the reference document is not a formal SOP). 4. The document is a work instruction, or 5. The document is a SOP, or 6. The document instructs staff how to use or apply the word ‘permanent’ from the Act.Where a document is in scope the request is for the whole document, not just the portion relating to impairment
I agree to the exclusion of non-SES details and applicant/participant personalinformation…`
Processing period
The original due date for our access decision on your FOI request was 5 April 2025. We have been experiencing processing delays and were not able to provide you with our decision by the due date. Consequently, your application was regarded as a deemed refusal under section 15AC of the FOI Act. We sincerely apologise for this.
We note that you have now applied to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) for a review by the Information Commissioner (IC) of our deemed refusal.
Revised decision under section 55G
Section 55G(1)(a) of the FOI Act provides that at any time during an IC review, an Agency may vary an access refusal decision in favour of the applicant by giving access to documents in accordance with the request (revised decision).
Section 55G(2) provides that an Agency must notify the IC of the revised decision, and that decision becomes the decision under review.
Searches conducted
Searches were conducted by the following business areas for documents relevant to the scope of your FOI request:
- Service Guidance
- Frontline Capability
- Scheme Eligibility
As a result of these searches, eleven (11) documents were located, these searches were undertaken between 27 March and 23 April 2025 and were overseen by senior staff.
Decision on access to documents
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act, including revised decisions under s55G of that Act. My revised decision on your request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.
I have decided to:
- Grant access in full to 6 documents
- Grant access in part to 5 documents in accordance with section 22 — Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
- Remove irrelevant material in accordance with section 22 of the FOI Act
Section 22 – Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
Section 22 of the FOI Act permits an agency to prepare and provide an edited copy of a document where the agency has decided to refuse access to an exempt document or that to give access to a document would disclose information that would reasonably be regarded as irrelevant to the request for access.
As per the scope of your request, you agreed to the exclusion of non-SES details, the information I have found irrelevant to your request are internal email addresses, which has been removed pursuant to section 22 of the FOI Act and the documents released to you in material form.
In reaching my decision, I took the following into account:
- your correspondence from 6 March 2025 outlining the scope of your request
- the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request
- the FOI Act
- the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act
- the notice of IC review
- consultation with relevant NDIA staff
Release of documents
The documents for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at Attachment A, are enclosed.
In accordance with section 55G(2) of the FOI Act, I will be providing the IC with a copy of this revised decision.
If you determine that you are satisfied with this revised decision and do not require this decision to be reviewed further by the IC, please let the Agency and the OAIC know.
If you would like clarification on any aspect of my decision, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at foi@ndis.gov.au.
Yours sincerely
Patrick (PHO293) Senior Freedom of Information Officer Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch Reviews and Information Release Division
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents for FOI 24/25-1472 | MR25/00665
| Document number | Page number | Description | Access Decision | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-53 | Operational Guidelines – Applying to the NDIS – Version 10.0 Date: 10 December 2024 |
FULL ACCESS | |
| 2 | 54-99 | Practice Guide – Access and ER – NDIS Amendment Act 2024 Date: 19 September 2024 |
PARTIAL ACCESS Exemption claimed: redacted: s22 – Irrelevant material |
Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 3 | 100-146 | Practice Guide – Access and ER – Version 2.0 Date: 16 February 2023 |
PARTIAL ACCESS Exemption claimed: redacted: s22 – Irrelevant material |
Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 4 | 147-161 | Case Study 1 – 24.1.b Date: Not Available |
FULL ACCESS | |
| 5 | 162-168 | Case Study 2 – 24.1.b Date: Not Available |
FULL ACCESS | |
| 6 | 169-175 | Case Study 3 – 24.1.b Date: Not Available |
FULL ACCESS |
| Document number | Page number | Description | Access Decision | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 176-276 | PowerPoint – Overview of access decision making – Version 1.0 Date: Not Available |
FULL ACCESS | |
| 8 | 277-295 | PowerPoint – Recap of the disability and Early Intervention Requirements Date: 31 August 2022 |
PARTIAL ACCESS Exemption claimed: redacted: s22 – Irrelevant material |
Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 9 | 296-323 | PowerPoint - National Access QDO & AA - Technical Meetings - Section 24(1)(b) Date: Not Available |
PARTIAL ACCESS Exemption claimed: redacted: s22 – Irrelevant material |
Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 10 | 324 | s24(1)(b) Presentation Guide Date: Not Available |
PARTIAL ACCESS Exemption claimed: redacted: s22 – Irrelevant material |
Irrelevant material removed under section 22 of the FOI Act |
| 11 | 325-362 | PowerPoint - s24(1)(b) – Version 1.0 Date: Not Available |
FULL ACCESS |