Section 1.6
Agency partners, contractors and delegates
Core rule. Engaging a Partner in the Community, contractor or delegate to perform an Agency function does not lower the standard a person is entitled to, or let responsibility disappear into the arrangement. The Agency must authorise that function in writing, ensure the person or body performing it is competent, resourced and monitored, and step in when a partner, contractor or delegate fails.
Legal
-
Application. This section applies, in addition to the duties that otherwise apply to them under this Code, to every Partner in the Community, contractor, subcontractor, delegate and any other person or entity authorised, engaged or funded to perform an Agency function under clause 1.1.4.
-
Written authority required. A person or entity must not perform an Agency function unless the function, its scope and any conditions are set out in a written instrument of delegation, contract, funding agreement, deed or other authorisation. An act or decision outside the scope of that written authority does not bind the Agency and must be identified and corrected on discovery, at no cost or disadvantage to the person affected.
-
Personal and genuine exercise of a delegated decision. A delegate exercising a statutory power or function must personally turn their mind to the decision, consider the material actually before them, and reach their own genuine state of satisfaction. A delegate must not adopt a recommendation, script, template or automated output as the decision without that personal consideration.
-
Competence, screening and resourcing. The Agency must not authorise, and must not continue to authorise, a Partner in the Community, contractor or delegate to perform an Agency function unless satisfied, on an ongoing basis, that the person or entity:
-
holds the training, disability awareness, cultural competence and any screening or qualification the function requires;
-
has the capacity, workload and resourcing to comply with this Code; and
-
is subject to Agency oversight, quality monitoring and a defined path by which the person affected can escalate to the Agency directly.
-
-
Same standard, not a lesser one. A Partner in the Community, contractor or delegate is bound by this Code to the same extent as an Agency employee performing the same function. A person must not receive a lower standard of service, a slower response, less accessible communication or a less accountable process because their matter is handled by a partner, contractor or delegate rather than directly by the Agency.
-
Continuity of access. Engaging a Partner in the Community or contractor to perform an ongoing function, including local area coordination or early childhood partner support, must not leave a person without timely, continuous access to that function. Where a partner or contractor becomes unresponsive, disengaged or unable to continue, the Agency must identify this and provide or restore direct or alternative access, without waiting for the person to raise it.
-
Records, evidence and continuity of the file. A Partner in the Community, contractor or delegate must promptly record and forward to the Agency any information, document or evidence a person provides, for the purpose it was provided. A failure to do so is not the fault of the person affected: on discovery, the Agency must treat the material as having been provided when the person first gave it to the partner, contractor or delegate, correct any resulting decision, and restore a deadline, priority or entitlement affected by the failure.
-
No misuse of delegated or contracted authority. A Partner in the Community, contractor or delegate must not use funding, planning, review, access-restriction or gatekeeping authority to penalise, discourage or retaliate against a person for self-advocacy, making a complaint, seeking a second opinion, using an advocate or support person, or contacting the Agency directly.
-
Identifiable decision-maker. A person is entitled to be told, on request, the name or a role-based identifier, and the source and scope of authority, of the specific delegate or worker who made, or is responsible for, a decision or service interaction affecting them.
-
Monitoring and consequence for systemic failure. The Agency must monitor the performance of each Partner in the Community, contractor and delegate arrangement against this Code, using information that includes complaints, review outcomes and, where available, the person’s own feedback. A pattern of noncompliant or substandard service by a partner, contractor or delegate must trigger a review of that arrangement, not only a response to the individual matter.
-
Continuity through change. Ending, varying, transferring or re-tendering a partner or contractor arrangement does not extinguish a person’s accrued rights, in-progress matter or entitlement to continuity of support under this Code. The Agency must ensure an orderly transfer of the person’s file, current supports and any outstanding action.
Plain English
This section covers what happens when the NDIA is not the one directly doing the work.
Who this covers
-
Local Area Coordinators and early childhood partners, contractors, subcontractors, contact-centre operators and anyone else the NDIA authorises, engages or funds to do NDIA work.
-
Every delegate — an NDIA officer given the legal power to make a decision on the Agency’s behalf.
Before the NDIA hands work to someone else
-
The NDIA must put the arrangement in writing and say exactly what the person or organisation is allowed to do.
-
If someone acts outside that written authority, it doesn’t bind the NDIA — but the NDIA must fix the problem, not the person affected.
-
The NDIA must be satisfied the person or organisation is trained, resourced and properly supervised before, and while, they do the work.
Delegates must decide for themselves
-
A delegate must actually think about a decision and the evidence in front of them.
-
A delegate cannot just sign off on a computer-generated recommendation or a standard template without genuinely considering the person’s situation.
The same rules apply
-
A Partner in the Community, contractor or delegate must follow this Code exactly as the NDIA itself must.
-
A person must not get a worse service — slower replies, less accessible communication, less accountability — just because a partner or contractor is handling their matter.
The NDIA is still responsible
-
If a Local Area Coordinator or partner goes quiet, is overloaded or can’t continue, the NDIA must notice and step in. The person should not have to chase it themselves.
-
If a partner or delegate loses or fails to pass on a document or piece of evidence, that is not the person’s fault. The NDIA must treat it as received on the date it was first given, fix any decision affected, and restore any deadline or priority that was lost.
-
A partner, contractor or delegate must never cut funding or withhold support to punish someone for advocating for themselves, making a complaint, or going around them to contact the NDIA directly.
Accountability
-
You can ask who specifically made a decision about you, and what gives them the authority to make it.
-
The NDIA must keep track of how well each partner, contractor and delegate arrangement is performing, and act on a pattern of poor service, not just one complaint at a time.
-
If a partner or contractor arrangement ends or changes, your rights, your current supports and anything in progress carry over. The NDIA must manage a smooth handover.
Easy Read
Sometimes someone else does NDIA work for you.
-
This could be a Local Area Coordinator, an early childhood partner, a company the NDIA pays to do some of its work, or an NDIA worker with delegated power to decide things.
-
These rules apply to them too.
-
You should get the same good service no matter who is helping you.
-
The NDIA must write down what the other person or company is allowed to do.
-
The NDIA must check they are trained and can do the job properly.
-
If a worker makes a decision about you, they must really think about your situation. They cannot just copy a computer’s suggestion.
-
If your Local Area Coordinator or partner stops replying to you, the NDIA must notice and help you another way.
-
If a partner loses something you gave them, that is not your fault. The NDIA must fix it and not make you miss out.
-
No one should cut your funding or support because you spoke up, complained, or asked to talk to the NDIA directly.
-
You can ask who made a decision about you and why they were allowed to.
-
If your Local Area Coordinator or contractor changes, your supports should keep going without a gap.
Evidence for this section
- Current legal anchor
Section 202 of the NDIS Act allows the CEO to delegate functions and powers only by writing; an act outside that written instrument does not bind the Agency. Sections 1.1.4 and 1.1.7 already state Code coverage and non-outsourcing; this section turns that coverage into specific operational duties for a Partner in the Community, contractor, subcontractor or delegate.
- Disability Royal Commission anchor
The Disability Royal Commission's human-rights framework describes public-authority compatibility and proper-consideration duties, requiring a decision-maker to genuinely turn their mind to the material before them rather than defer to a recommendation or a standard process.
- Verified internal practice anchor
The Safeguarding the participant's interests Practice Guide states it is for all NDIA staff, with particular application to planners, Partners in the Community, delegates, payment staff, the National Contact Centre, complaints and escalation teams. The Participant Critical Incident Practice Guide similarly covers all NDIA, contact-centre and partner staff on a no-wrong-door basis. Both support extending an equal, accountable standard, competence expectations and continuity of access to every partner, contractor and delegate.
- Verified internal practice anchor
The draft Guiding Principles for the NDIA's Dispute Resolution Policy call for direct decision-maker contact and accessible, trauma-informed, CRPD-compliant engagement, supporting a person's entitlement to know who made a decision affecting them and on what authority.
- Verified internal practice anchor
Internal guidance on managing unreasonable behaviour already expects a fair, consultative and proportionate approach before the Agency restricts a person's access. This section applies that same standard to a partner, contractor or delegate's use of funding, planning, review or gatekeeping authority.
- Proposed extension
Continuity of access when a partner disengages, correction when a partner fails to record or forward a person's evidence, monitoring partner and delegate performance, and continuity through a change of contractor are drafted as new enforceable standards. They are informed by a recurring, still-evolving pattern in an in-progress, unpublished thematic coding of de-identified lived-experience and Senate-submission material (the themes project) -- draft and not yet corroborated to publication standard, and not cited here as evidence.
Make a contribution to this section
Propose replacement text for one version of this section. A maintainer reviews every suggestion before anything changes on the site.
Suggesting edits is temporarily disabled.