Section 1.5
Equality, non-discrimination and reasonable adjustment
Core rule. The Agency must remove disability-related barriers so people can participate on an equal basis. Identical treatment is not equal service when the standard process is inaccessible.
Legal
-
Equality duty. A Code duty holder must respect equality before and under the law and provide each person with equal and effective access to Agency information, services, processes, decisions, complaints and remedies.
-
Non-discrimination. A duty holder must not directly or indirectly discriminate on the basis of disability, a disability-related attribute, conduct that is a symptom or manifestation of disability, use of a carer, assistant, interpreter, assistance animal or disability aid, association with a person with disability, or a need for adjustment.
-
Denial of adjustment. A failure to make an adjustment required for equal and effective access is discrimination under this Code unless the Agency demonstrates, on the evidence of the particular case, that the adjustment would impose unjustifiable hardship and complies with clause 1.5.8.
-
Proactive identification of barriers. The Agency must anticipate and remove common barriers through accessible and universally designed services. In an individual matter, a duty holder must ask what the person needs, notice evident barriers and offer adjustments without requiring the person to use a particular legal term.
-
No unnecessary proof. The Agency must not require a diagnosis, professional report or detailed disclosure merely to establish a need for an ordinary service adjustment where the barrier and requested change are apparent or can reasonably be accepted from the person’s account. Any evidence requested must be relevant, proportionate and no more intrusive than necessary.
-
Recording and continuity. With the person’s knowledge and subject to consent and privacy law, the Agency must record agreed communication needs and adjustments in a form visible to workers who need the information. The person must not be required to renegotiate an ongoing adjustment at each interaction unless their needs or the relevant circumstances have changed.
-
Timely implementation. An adjustment must be arranged early enough to make participation effective. If an Agency barrier or delay in arranging an adjustment affects a deadline, appointment, response period or entitlement to be heard, the Agency must preserve the person’s position and provide a reasonable extension or new opportunity.
-
No charge or disadvantage. A person must not be charged for an adjustment or disadvantaged in priority, credibility, service quality, decision-making, timeframe or access to review because they need or use an adjustment, advocate, interpreter, communication partner, carer, assistant, assistance animal or disability aid.
-
Considering and refusing an adjustment. The Agency must not refuse a requested adjustment unless an appropriately authorised officer:
-
consults the person about the barrier, desired outcome and possible alternatives;
-
considers the person’s evidence and account, the likely benefit and detriment, available resources and assistance, and the consequences of refusal;
-
determines on specific evidence that the requested adjustment is ineffective, unlawful or would impose unjustifiable hardship;
-
identifies and offers the most effective accessible alternative; and
-
gives accessible written reasons, the evidence relied on, any interim arrangement and available complaint or review rights.
-
-
Burden of justification. The Agency bears the burden of establishing that an adjustment would impose unjustifiable hardship or that a requirement or condition that disadvantages people with disability is reasonable in the circumstances.
-
Intersectional equality and cultural safety. In identifying and removing barriers, the Agency must consider compounded disadvantage and provide culturally safe service, including for First Nations people with disability, people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities, women and gender-diverse people, children and young people, older people, LGBTQIA+ people, people in rural or remote communities and people experiencing poverty, homelessness or family violence.
-
Systemic accessibility. The Agency must test policies, premises, documents, forms, portals, automated systems, procurement and contact channels for accessibility before implementation and at regular intervals. Universal design does not remove the duty to provide individual adjustments.
-
Monitoring. The Agency must collect and publish de-identified information sufficient to identify adjustment failures, discriminatory outcomes and unequal service patterns, while protecting privacy and involving people with disability in deciding what should be measured and how findings should be interpreted.
Plain English
The standard NDIA process will not work equally for everyone. The Agency must change the process when disability creates a barrier.
-
A person does not need to know the words reasonable adjustment. If staff can see a barrier, or the person explains it, staff must help identify an effective change.
-
Common adjustments include written rather than phone communication, extra processing time, Easy Read, Auslan or other interpreting, captioning, a quiet or remote meeting, a support person, breaks, accessible documents and flexible ways to provide information.
-
The Agency must not require an expensive new report for an ordinary communication or process adjustment when the need can reasonably be accepted without it.
-
Once an ongoing adjustment is agreed, the Agency must record and follow it. People must not have to explain the same disability need to every new worker.
-
If the NDIA caused a missed deadline by using an inaccessible process, it must restore the person’s opportunity rather than treating the failure as the person’s fault.
-
The NDIA cannot simply say an adjustment is unavailable. It must consult, justify any refusal with evidence, offer the most effective alternative and explain complaint rights.
-
Good universal design reduces the number of individual requests, but it never removes the need to respond to a person’s particular circumstances.
Easy Read
You have the right to equal service.
-
Equal service does not always mean the same service.
-
You can ask the NDIA to change how something is done.
-
The change is called an adjustment.
-
For example, you can ask the NDIA to email you instead of calling you.
-
You can ask for Easy Read, an interpreter, more time or a support person.
-
The NDIA must ask what helps you.
-
The NDIA must not make you explain the same need to every worker.
-
You do not have to pay for an adjustment.
-
The NDIA must not treat you worse because you need an adjustment.
-
If the NDIA says no, it must explain why and offer another good way.
Evidence for this section
- Current legal anchor
The Disability Discrimination Act defines direct and indirect discrimination, includes failure to make reasonable adjustments, and places the burden of proving reasonableness or unjustifiable hardship on the person relying on it. Section 29 applies to administration of Commonwealth laws and programs.
- Treaty anchor
CRPD article 2 treats denial of reasonable accommodation as discrimination; article 5 requires equality and reasonable accommodation; articles 9 and 21 address accessibility and access to information and communication.
- Current legal anchor
NDIS Act Sections 4, 5 and 17A support equal partnership, supported communication, attention to cultural and linguistic circumstances, assumed capacity and choice and control.
- Disability Royal Commission anchor
Royal Commission Volume 4 recommended a stronger positive disability-equality duty, action on compounded barriers, accessibility and universal design, and replacing reasonable adjustments with adjustments in the DDA.
- Verified internal practice anchor
Within dispute resolution, the draft NDIA policy adopts the Participant Service Charter commitments to make information and decisions easy to access and understand, respond to individual needs and circumstances, recognise participants as experts in their own lives and support access to services and supports. These commitments support the feasibility of responsive, accessible service, but do not by themselves supply the Code's detailed adjustment procedure.
- Proposed extension
Proactive identification, no unnecessary proof, recording an ongoing adjustment once, preserving deadlines, senior refusal reasons, the most effective alternative and public monitoring are drafted as new enforceable Agency service standards.
- Verified internal practice anchor
Internal guidance on contact restrictions already refers to capacity, individual circumstances and proportionality. This draft applies the stronger equality and adjustment framework before a disability-related communication pattern can lead to restricted access.